Aloysius College
22, Jaffna Road, Anuradhapura 071-8309137
GCE (A.L) English Literature
Themes
The Will to Live
Life of Pi is a story about struggling to
survive through seemingly insurmountable odds. The shipwrecked inhabitants of
the little lifeboat don’t simply acquiesce to their fate: they actively fight
against it. Pi abandons his lifelong vegetarianism and eats fish to sustain
himself. Orange Juice, the peaceful orangutan, fights ferociously against the
hyena. Even the severely wounded zebra battles to stay alive; his slow, painful
struggle vividly illustrates the sheer strength of his life force. As Martel
makes clear in his novel, living creatures will often do extraordinary,
unexpected, and sometimes heroic things to survive. However, they will also do
shameful and barbaric things if pressed. The hyena’s treachery and the blind
Frenchman’s turn toward cannibalism show just how far creatures will go when
faced with the possibility of extinction. At the end of the novel, when Pi
raises the possibility that the fierce tiger, Richard Parker, is actually an aspect of his own personality, and
that Pi himself is responsible for some of the horrific events he has narrated,
the reader is forced to decide just what kinds of actions are acceptable in a
life-or-death situation.
The Importance of Storytelling
Life of Pi is a story within a story
within a story. The novel is framed by a (fictional) note from the author, Yann
Martel, who describes how he first came to hear the fantastic tale of Piscine Molitor Patel. Within the framework of Martel’s narration is
Pi’s fantastical first-person account of life on the open sea, which forms the
bulk of the book. At the end of the novel, a transcript taken from an
interrogation of Pi reveals the possible “true” story within that story: that there were no animals at all, and
that Pi had spent those 227 days with other
human survivors who all eventually perished, leaving only himself.
Pi, however, is not a liar: to him, the various
versions of his story each contain a different kind of truth. One version may
be factually true, but the other has an emotional or thematic truth that the
other cannot approach. Throughout the novel, Pi expresses disdain for
rationalists who only put their faith in “dry, yeastless factuality,” when
stories—which can amaze and inspire listeners, and are bound to linger longer
in the imagination—are, to him, infinitely superior.
Storytelling is also a means of survival. The
“true” events of Pi’s sea voyage are too horrible to contemplate directly: any
young boy would go insane if faced with the kinds of acts Pi (indirectly) tells
his integrators he has witnessed. By recasting his account as an incredible
tale about humanlike animals, Pi doesn’t have to face the true cruelty human
beings are actually capable of. Similarly, by creating the character of Richard
Parker, Pi can disavow the ferocious, violent side of his personality that
allowed him to survive on the ocean. Even this is not, technically, a lie in
Pi’s eyes. He believes that the tiger-like aspect of his nature and the
civilized, human aspect stand in tense opposition and occasional partnership
with one another, just as the boy Pi and the tiger Richard Parker are both
enemies and allies.
The Nature of Religious Belief
Life of Pi begins with an old man in
Pondicherry who tells the narrator, “I have a story that will make you believe
in God.” Storytelling and religious belief are two closely linked ideas in the
novel. On a literal level, each of Pi’s three religions, Hinduism,
Christianity, and Islam, come with its own set of tales and fables, which are
used to spread the teachings and illustrate the beliefs of the faith. Pi enjoys
the wealth of stories, but he also senses that, as Father Martin assured him
was true of Christianity, each of these stories might simply be aspects of a
greater, universal story about love.
Stories and religious beliefs are
also linked in Life of Pi because Pi asserts
that both require faith on the part of the listener or devotee. Surprisingly
for such a religious boy, Pi admires atheists. To him, the important thing is
to believe in something, and Pi can
appreciate an atheist’s ability to believe in the absence of God with no
concrete proof of that absence. Pi has nothing but disdain, however, for
agnostics, who claim that it is impossible to know either way, and who
therefore refrain from making a definitive statement on the question of God. Pi
sees this as evidence of a shameful lack of imagination. To him, agnostics who
cannot make a leap of faith in either direction are like listeners who cannot
appreciate the non-literal truth a fictional story might provide.
No comments:
Post a Comment