Saturday, August 28, 2021

Robert Frost Modern Poet

 Robert Frost highlights the problems faced by the modern man through his poems. Discuss with reference to Stopping by Woods and The Road not taken.

Robert Frost is an American poet (1873-1963). He lived in the United States. He has written so many poems. Some of them are “Out! Out, Mending Wall, Road Not Taken, Stopping by Woods, After Apple-Picking, My Butterfly, and A Minor Bird.” He was awarded a gold medal for his poetry from the American Academy of Arts.  We have studied two poems in our anthology. They are “Stopping by Woods and Road Not Taken”. Frost depicts the problems, which have been faced by modern man through these two poems. I am going to discuss those issues as follows:

First, I have selected the poem, “Stopping by Woods…” written by Robert frost for my discussion. This poem has been written to depict the conflict between the material life and spiritual life of a modern man.

“"But I have promises to keep…”, depicts the boundaries and limits in which human beings pass their lives, and they do not allow them to feel the beauty of nature. Although the speaker wants to stop and see the beauty of nature, he is unable to do so as he has to fulfill more responsibilities. Thus, the poet wants to say that the modern man has no time to stay in that beautiful place and enjoy its natural beauty. This is a common problem today for many human beings. Their lives have become mechanical and artificial.

“He will not see me stopping here.”  This line refers to the owner of the forest, who is not interested in its natural beauty. The owner of this wood doesn't want to see the beauty of this land. He may use this wood for earning money only. Robert Frost wants to emphasize that the modern man fails to admire the aesthetic value of  things. He is interested only in a materialistic world. Even the horse hates to stay there. It also does not feel the aesthetic value of this beautiful forest as the owner of the woods.

The the poem, Road Not Taken has also been written by Robert Frost to highlight the nature of the modern man.

“I took the one less traveled by,

And that has made all the difference.”

 

Here, it is clear that the poet has chosen the road which was used by a few people. It is really a big challenge. By selecting this road, he has really faced a challenge. It is not only a challenge but also a risk. We must admire such people. However, such people have to face many problems as it is a new experience. Anyway, at the end, he seems to be suffering. Hence, as intellectual people, we have to think twice before arriving at such a decision. The man in modern society behaves like this. He usually takes decisions without thinking deeply. He is not far-sighted and takes decisions and later he has to suffer a lot.

In conclusion, it is obvious that the modern man seems to have some weaknesses, which adversely affect his life. He finds it difficult to find time for entertaining himself since he is frequently busy with his day-to-day activities as we have discussed earlier. He is also greedy for money and property. It is the other weakness he has in his life. Moreover, he is not a good decision-maker. He is narrow-minded and fails to predict what will happen next.

 

 

Monday, August 23, 2021

GCE OL English Literature Sri Lanka 2021/2022: Drama Twilight of a Crane

 Sources: The Twilight of a Crane – Sample Answer – THE WORDS ACADEMY

Twilight of a Crane shows how human beings are caught between their desire for money and passion for love.’ Do you agree? Discuss, referring to the play.

The play is written by Junji Kinoshita and is adapted from a folk tale. He is a leftist writer and used his creativity to make people more aware of the insidious allure of money, capitalism and consumerism. I agree with the above statement and in this essay, I will explore how the love of money becomes a root cause of the dissipation of human relationships.

At the beginning of the play, the audience is presented with a serene scene with children running around. They wake Yohyo and he plays with them. This implies that the children love being around their house. Children love to spend time at places where there is love, peace and harmony, and where they are given the attention they need. They also ask for Tsu; they clearly love her. The neighbours trust them enough to let their children play around their house. These facts show us that Yohyo and Tsu had a great understanding and that there were signs of a happy, content and satisfied family at their home.

‘sweet heart’ / ‘darling’ / ‘dear’

The two main characters use endearing terms as shown above to refer to each other. This is a sign of being devoted or even doting on one another. It is safe to say that they love one another. The use of such terms reveal the intimacy they share and the trust they place on one another. Their lives have become valuable to each other. If there is any resentment or bitterness toward your partner, using such words is not possible. Therefore, we can argue that there is no conflict whatsoever between them, and that they are transparent with each other.

‘Cold soup is no good for my sweet heart.

Likewise, their actions align with these sentiments. Yohyo is portrayed in the play as someone who is not the brightest nor the most skilled individual. However, despite this, he is very keen in ensuring that the soup is warmed up for Tsu. He shows how considerate he is, as he says that cold soup would do no good – he is genuinely concerned about Tsu’s well-being and nourishment. This is evidence that Yohyo was fully devoted to Tsu and loved her and valued her as an important person in his life.

However, Unzu and Sodo influence Yohyo in a negative way. These two characters from the village represent capitalist ideas – they are more concerned about profit and money than human lives. The fact that Tsu becomes extremely weak while she makes the cloth is a rather obvious symbol of the exploitation which is a feature of capitalism. These two characters persuade Yohyo into getting his wife Tsu to make more and more Senba ori. She becomes extremely weak. This reflects the capitalist system which devalues human lives and gives a higher value to money and profit.

‘Well, then, you might coax your wife again’

Unzu and Sodo manipulate Yohyo by their enticing words. As mentioned above, they represent capitalism, and they persuade Yohyo with promises about money and a fancy experience in Kyoto. The significant fact is that he was perfectly content when the two of them approached him. He had enough and more money (a whole sack full of it), He had a loving wife who took care of him, and he had a life full of joy. It was a simple, yet peaceful and fulfilling life. Even the villagers and the children adored them and loved to spend time with them. Yohyo had a strong relationship with his wife. He valued her and took care of her. With the arrival of Unzu and Sodo, he begins to change. Tsu mentions that he is ‘gradually’ changing. This adverb is important as it shows us that it is a slow process. Yohyo transforms into someone else. His perception of things in his world changes. Even though he valued Tsu more than anything in the world, the Senba Ori and the money it would bring him entices him and he cannot help being more and more attached to the idea of money. 

Yohyo, my dear- what’s happened to you? You are gradually changing. I can’t understand why. But you are moving to the other world where I can never live.

Tsu perceives the change happening in Yohyo, and is worried about the transformation. She reminisces about how he used to be a kind and considerate person who cared about others without expecting anything in return. But the love of money has begun to poison his heart and she says that he is moving to the other world. She identifies the love of money, or avarice, as a different world because capitalism and its obsession over profit (at the cost of humanity and human relationships) is something beyond her understanding. She fails to speak or understand the language of capitalism. When Unzu and Sodo speaks to her, she does not understand them. When Yohyo tries to persuade her, she finds it difficult to understand what he says.  This is because he is moving away from his passion for love and becoming desirous of money. The first cloth he receives from her was received as a gift – he was able to see the beauty and the value of it as something special given to him by Tsu. Later on, they merely become objects that will get him money. Rather than seeing the effort and the love that Tsu puts into the cloth, or seeing the beauty of it, Yohyo’s perception of it has changed to a strictly capitalistic one. This is the moment that he begins to lose his love for Tsu.

Yes, I dislike you. I don’t like you. I’m not fond of you- you are a cross woman!  

Yohyo’s behaviour towards Tsu changes as his priorities begin to get mixed up. Rather than valuing his wife above everything, he values money or the Senba Ori above his wife. Therefore, he begins to see her not in a loving manner, but through the eyes of the capitalist system. An employee who needs to be exploited, or a resource to be used up for maximum profit. When the desire to extract the value from this human capital is not fulfilled, Yohyo acts like a disgruntled manager who is complaining about his employee. Their relationship which was transparent and genuine without any interference of a third party has been infiltrated by the money. 

As the play comes to an end, Tsu leaves Yohyo and he holds on tightly to the cloth she made for him. This may possibly indicate the fact that he is unable to let go of his desire for money. He ends up losing Tsu, who loved him with all her heart – everything valuable that he had is lost. This play thus exemplifies how Yohyo’s desire for money overpowers his passion for love and he ends up making the wrong choices and ends up losing his most valuable relationships.

 

Bhiksu University of Sri Lanka External Degree Program-2021 [Robert Frost]

 Robert Frost (1874 –1963) was a modern American poet, who has composed many poems about the modern man and his behavior. Some of his poems are as follows:

1.      Out! Out!

2.      Mending Wall

3.      Road Not Taken

4.      Stopping By Woods

  1. After Apple Picking

6.      My Butterfly

7.      A Minor Bird

His poems are realistic depictions of rural life and they reveal the reality of modern life. Frost frequently wrote about settings from rural life in New England in the early 20th century, using them to examine complex social and philosophical themes. Frost was honored frequently during his lifetime and is the only poet to receive four Pulitzer Prizes for Poetry. He became one of America's rare public literary figures, almost an artistic institution. He was awarded the Congressional Gold Medal in 1960 for his poetic works. On July 22, 1961, Frost was named Poet Laureate of Vermont.

Frost's father was a teacher and later an editor  Frost graduated from Lawrence High School in 1892.[5] Frost's mother joined the Swedenborgian church and had him baptized in it, but he left it as an adult. Although known for his later association with rural life, Frost grew up in the city, and he published his first poem in his high school's magazine. Frost returned home to teach and to work at various jobs, including helping his mother teach her class of unruly boys, delivering newspapers, and working in a factory maintaining carbon arc lamps. He did not enjoy these jobs, feeling his true calling was poetry. In 1894, he sold his first poem, "My Butterfly. An Elegy" (published in the November 8, 1894, edition of the New York Independent) for $15 ($449 today). Proud of his accomplishment, he proposed marriage to Elinor Miriam White, but she demurred, wanting to finish college (at St. Lawrence University) before they married. Frost then went on an excursion to the Great Dismal Swamp in Virginia and asked Elinor again upon his return. Having graduated, she agreed, and they were married at Lawrence, Massachusetts on December 19, 1895. Frost attended Harvard University from 1897 to 1899, but he left voluntarily due to illness.[6][7][8] Shortly before his death, Frost's grandfather purchased a farm for Robert and Elinor in Derry, New Hampshire; Frost worked the farm for nine years while writing early in the mornings and producing many of the poems that would later become famous. Ultimately his farming proved unsuccessful and he returned to the field of education as an English teacher at New Hampshire's n 1912, Frost sailed with his family to Great Britain, settling first in Beaconsfield, a small town outside London. While teaching at the University of Michigan, he was awarded a lifetime appointment at the university as a Fellow in Letters. Robert Frost's personal life was plagued by grief and loss. In 1885 when he was 11, his father died of tuberculosis, leaving the family with just eight dollars. Frost's mother died of cancer in 1900. In 1920, he had to commit his younger sister Jeanie to a mental hospital, where she died nine years later. Mental illness apparently ran in Frost's family, as both he and his mother suffered from depression, and his daughter Irma was committed to a mental hospital in 1947. Frost's wife, Elinor, also experienced bouts of depression.[18] Elinor and Robert Frost had six children. Frost's wife, who had heart problems throughout her life, developed breast cancer in 1937, and died of heart failure in 1938.[18] the greatest of the American poets of this century. Frost's virtues are extraordinary. No other living poet has written so well about the actions of ordinary men; his wonderful dramatic monologues or dramatic scenes come out of a knowledge of people that few poets have had, and they are written in a verse that uses, sometimes with absolute mastery, the rhythms of actual speech". He also praised "Frost's seriousness and honesty", stating that Frost was particularly skilled at representing a wide range of human experience in his poems.[30]s Frost's deep knowledge of Greek and Roman classics influenced much of his work.

 "The Road Not Taken" is an ambiguous poem that allows the reader to think about choices in life, whether to go with the mainstream or go it alone. If life is a journey, this poem highlights those times in life when a decision has to be made.Sep 3, 2020

Written in 1915 in England, "The Road Not Taken" is one of Robert Frost's—and the world's—most well-known poems. Although commonly interpreted as a celebration of rugged individualism, the poem actually contains multiple different meanings. The speaker in the poem, faced with a choice between two roads, takes the road "less traveled," a decision which he or she supposes "made all the difference." However, Frost creates enough subtle ambiguity in the poem that it's unclear whether the speaker's judgment should be taken at face value, and therefore, whether the poem is about the speaker making a simple but impactful choice, or about how the speaker interprets a choice whose impact is unclear. The Road Not Taken” Summary

The speaker, walking through a forest whose leaves have turned yellow in autumn, comes to a fork in the road. The speaker, regretting that he or she is unable to travel by both roads (since he or she is, after all, just one person), stands at the fork in the road for a long time and tries to see where one of the paths leads. However, the speaker can't see very far because the forest is dense and the road is not straight.

The speaker takes the other path, judging it to be just as good a choice as the first, and supposing that it may even be the better option of the two, since it is grassy and looks less worn than the other path. Though, now that the speaker has actually walked on the second road, he or she thinks that in reality the two roads must have been more or less equally worn-in.

Reinforcing this statement, the speaker recalls that both roads were covered in leaves, which had not yet been turned black by foot traffic. The speaker exclaims that he or she is in fact just saving the first road, and will travel it at a later date, but then immediately contradicts him or herself with the acknowledgement that, in life, one road tends to lead onward to another, so it's therefore unlikely that he or she will ever actually get a chance to return to that first road.

The speaker imagines him or herself in the distant future, recounting, with a sigh, the story of making the choice of which road to take. Speaking as though looking back on his or her life from the future, the speaker states that he or she was faced with a choice between two roads and chose to take the road that was less traveled, and the consequences of that decision have made all the difference in his or her life.

In "The Road Not Taken," the speaker describes him or herself as facing a choice between which of two roads to take. The speaker's choice functions as an extended metaphor for all the choices that the speaker—and all people—must make in life. Through the speaker's experience, the poem explores the nature of choices, and what it means to be a person forced to choose (as all people inevitably are).

The poem begins with the speaker recounting the experience of facing the choice of which road to take. The speaker's first emotion is "sorrow," as he or she regrets the reality that makes it impossible to "travel both" roads, or to experience both things. The poem makes clear that every choice involves the loss of opportunity and that choices are painful because they must be made with incomplete information. The speaker tries to gather as much information as possible by looking "down one [road] as far as I could," but there is a limit to what the speaker can see, as the road is "bent," meaning that it curves, leaving the rest of it out of sight. So the speaker, like anyone faced with a choice, must make a choice, but can't know enough to be sure which choice is the right one. The speaker, as a result, is paralyzed: "long I stood" contemplating which road to choose.

The speaker does eventually choose a road based on which one appears to have been less traveled, but the poem shows that making that choice doesn't actually solve the speaker's problem. Immediately after choosing a road, the speaker admits that the two roads were "worn... really about the same" and that both roads "equally lay" without any leaves "trodden black" by passersby. So the speaker has tried to choose the road that seemed less traveled, but couldn't tell which road was actually less traveled. By making a choice, the speaker will now never get the chance to experience the other road and can never know which was less traveled. The speaker hides from this psychic pain by announcing that he or she is just saving "the first [road] for another day!" But, again, reality sets in: "I doubted if I should ever come back." Every choice may be a beginning, but it is also an ending, and having to choose cuts off knowledge of the alternate choice, such that the person choosing will never know if they made the "right" choice.

The poem ends with the speaker imagining the far future, when he or she thinks back to this choice and believes that it made "all the difference." But the rest of the poem has shown that the speaker doesn't (and can never) know what it would have been like to travel down that other road—and can't even know if the road taken was indeed the one less traveled. And, further, the final line is a subtle reminder that the only thing one can know about the choices one makes in life is that they make “all the difference”—but how, or from what, neither the poem nor life provide any answer.

In "The Road Not Taken," the speaker is faced with a choice between two roads and elects to travel by the one that appears to be slightly less worn. The diverging roads may be read as being an extended metaphor for two kinds of life choices in general: the conventional versus the unconventional. By choosing the less-traveled path over the well-traveled path, the speaker suggests that he or she values individualism over conformity.

The speaker, when deciding which road to take, notes that the second is “just as fair” as the first, but that it has “perhaps the better claim, / Because it was grassy and wanted wear.” In other words, the second road had the added benefit of being less well-worn than the first. Notably, this absence of signs of travel is phrased positively rather than negatively. Rather than stating outright that the road looked as if it had not had many travelers, the speaker states that it was “grassy” (a consequence of low foot traffic) and that it “wanted wear” (as if it were almost asking for the speaker to walk on it). The speaker presents nonconformity as a positive trait, and even implies that popularity can make things less appealing: the first road, because of its popularity, lacks the grass that makes the second path so enticing.

Despite the speaker’s preference for nonconformity, though, the poem ultimately remains ambiguous about whether choosing the road “less traveled” necessarily leads to a better or more interesting life. First, the poem questions whether it's actually even possible to identify what is non-conformist. After choosing the road that seems to have been less traveled, the speaker then comments that, in fact, the two roads had been "worn ... really about the same." The speaker seems to sense that though he or she has attempted to take the road "less traveled," there's no actual way to know if it was less traveled.

Second, the poem subtly questions its own final line, in which the speaker asserts that choosing the road he or she did actually take has made "all the difference.” Many readers interpret this final line as being an affirmation of the speaker’s decision to venture off the beaten path. But note that the poem is careful not to state that choosing the road less traveled has necessarily made a positive difference. Further, because the poem has raised the possibility that the path the speaker took was not in fact "less traveled," it also raises the possibility that the speaker is wrong, and taking that particular path can't be said to have made any specific difference at all. There is also a third option offered by the poem, which is that the speaker is correct that choosing that road "made all the difference," but that this "difference" was created not by taking the objectively less traveled path—because no one can measure precisely which path was less traveled—but rather by making the choice to try to take the less traveled path. In this reading, the poem implies

In “The Road Not Taken,” the speaker must choose between two roads without having complete information about how they differ. Even after having chosen the second road, the speaker is unable to evaluate his or her experience, because the speaker can't know how things would have been different if he or she had chosen the first road. In the final stanza, the speaker imagines him or herself in the distant future looking back on this choice. In this way, the poem engages not just with a choice being made, but with the way that the speaker interprets that choice and assigns it meaning after the fact. It is only when looking back, after all, that the speaker sees the choice of which road to take as having made "all the difference."

Many people read the poem straightforwardly, and believe the choice did make "all the difference." The poem, however, is not clear about whether the speaker's final assertion is true. The speaker explains that he or she chose to take the second road because it seemed more “grassy” and less worn than the first, but soon admits that the two roads were actually worn to "about the same" degree. By raising the question of whether there was actually anything special about the road the speaker chose to take, the poem further questions whether taking the second road could have possibly "made all the difference," or even any difference at all. The poem implies that the speaker in the future may look back and construct a narrative of his or her life that is simpler and cleaner, and which gives this choice more meaning than the truth would support. Using this interpretation, the poem can be read as commenting more broadly on how all people fictionalize their lives by interpreting their choices, in hindsight, as being more purposeful and meaningful than they really are.

The poem can also be read in a third and more positive way, though. In this third interpretation, the poem implies that it’s less important whether the speaker’s choice actually "made all the difference" than it is that he or she believes that it did. In this reading, the poem recognizes that the speaker—and all people—fictionalize their lives by creating meaning where there may not be any, but portrays such meaning-making not as fraudulent, but rather as a part of being human.

All three of these different possible readings co-exist in "The Road Not Taken." The poem does not suggest a solution to the question of the meaning in the speaker's choice, but rather comes to embody the question itself, allowing for contemplation of the

The famous opening lines of "The Road Not Taken" introduce readers to the choice the speaker faces, which will become the main focus of the poem: two roads diverge, and the speaker, unable to travel both, must choose between them. It's important to notice that, right from the start in line 2, the speaker reveals a sense of sorrow at having to choose between the two roads: he or she is "sorry" that choosing one road means missing out on the other. The speaker's struggle sets up one of the poem's main themes—the role of choice and uncertainty in life. It also reveals something important about the speaker's attitude towards the role of choice in life: his or her sense of regret that one is often forced to choose, and that choosing one thing means not choosing another.

The speaker's regret lingers through the rest of the poem, so that, even after he or she has made a decision, it is difficult not to wonder about what would have been had he or she chosen the other road. One of the core ironies of the poem is that it doesn't actually matter which road the speaker chooses, since both roads would leave him or her with a feeling of regret about what he or she might have missed out on. The poem's title also speaks to this dilemma directly, not only signaling that the focus of the poem is the road not taken, but even implying that there will always be a road not taken, and with it an unshakable feeling of regret over what one might have missed. Frost himself even indicated at one point that he may have modeled the speaker in this poem after an acquaintance of his named Edward Thomas, whom he described as "a person who, whichever road he went, would be sorry he didn't go the other."

In light of the choice presented in the poem's first lines, the most obvious guiding question for the poem may at first seem to be, "Which road will the speaker choose?" But if one keeps in mind that the speaker will be stuck with a feeling of regret no matter which road he or she chooses, the guiding question then becomes, "How will the speaker deal with his or her feeling of regret at having been forced, by the demands of life, to choose one road rather than the other?"

The entirety of "The Road Not Taken" is an extended metaphor in which the two roads that diverge symbolize life's many choices. In much the same way that people are generally unable to see what the future holds, the speaker is unable to see what lies ahead on each path. Furthermore, what little the speaker thinks he or she understands about each path at the moment of decision later turns out to have been less clear cut, underscoring the impossibility of predicting where one's life choices will lead. Just as there are no "do-overs" in life, the speaker acknowledges (in lines 2-3 and 14-15) that he or she can only travel one road, and will not be granted the chance to "come back" and try another route. In these ways, the diverging roads in the poem symbolize all of life's choices—the confusion of having to make choices in the moment, the painful impossibility of foreseeing their consequences, and the sense, when looking back, that those choices defined your life, even when you can't know in what way, or even whether they did at all.

The entirety of "The Road Not Taken" is an extended metaphor in which the road "less traveled" symbolizes the path of nonconformity. The speaker, when trying to choose which road to take, looks for the road that seems less worn. At the end of the poem, the speaker asserts that choosing the road less traveled "has made all the difference"—the suggestion being that he or she has led a life of nonconformity, and is happier because of it. However, the status of the road less traveled as a symbol of nonconformity is complicated somewhat by the fact that the poem makes it clear that the speaker has no way of actually knowing whether the road he or she chose was really the road less traveled: both roads, after all, are "worn...really about the same." This, in turn, raises questions about the speaker's notions of individualism and nonconformity, suggesting that these ideals may not be as easily definable as the speaker of the poem thinks. In this way, the road less traveled is as much a symbol of nonconformity as it is a symbol of the

"The Road Not Taken" is an example of an extended metaphor in which the tenor (or the thing being spoken about) is never stated explicitly—but it's clear that the poet is using the road less traveled as a metaphor for leading an unconventional way of life. The entire poem, then, is an extended metaphor in which the fork in the road represents all of the many choices one faces in life.

As with all extended metaphors, this one contains many smaller metaphors inside it. The bend in the road that the speaker describes in line 5 may be read as a metaphor for people's inability to comprehend the consequences of their decisions before they make them. The speaker's realization that, despite his or her initial impressions, the two roads are in fact equally untraveled (lines 9-12) may be interpreted within the context of the extended metaphor to mean that everyone's life is unique, no matter what path one chooses.

Frost uses this extended metaphor to argue that life is full of moments in which one is forced to decide between two or more alternatives without complete information about what each choice entails, while the speaker's attempts to rationalize his or her decision in the moment, and to assign it meaning after the fact (as described in the last stanza), mirror the ways in which all people attempt to rationalize and make meaning out of the choices they make in life.

"The Road Not Taken" is an example of formal verse (meaning that it rhymes and has a strict meter), but it doesn't adhere to any specific poetic form (such as a sonnet) that dictates, for instance, how many lines a poem must have.

"The Road Not Taken" is a 20-line poem made up of four quintains (five-line stanzas). The four stanzas loosely correspond to the four stages of the speaker's engagement with the decision which the poem takes as its subject: weighing the different options; choosing to take the road less traveled; realizing the decision-making process was flawed; and finally, attempting to make sense of the experience despite this.

"The Road Not Taken" is written in loose iambic tetrameter, meaning that each line mostly consists of iambs (unstressed-stressed) and has roughly eight syllables. However, Frost frequently substitutes anapests (unstressed-unstressed-stressed) for iambs throughout the poem. For instance, in the poem's first stanza, each line contains three iambs and one anapest:

Two roads diverged in a yellow wood,
And sorry I could not travel both
And be one traveler, long I stood
And looked down one as far as I could
To where it bent in the undergrowth;

Note that in the above, the order of iambs and anapests differs from line to line. For instance, the first line goes iamb-iamb-anapest-iamb, while the second goes iamb-anapest-iamb-iamb.

Frost's approach to meter is artful but not strict, lending the poem a pleasing rhythm while still allowing for him to employ an informal, reflective tone that doesn't feel artificial because of an unnaturally consistent pattern of stresses.

Frost's use of iambs also lends the poem a steady rhythm of walking (step-step step-step), helping to capture the experience of the speaker's walk through the woods in the sound of the words.

"The Road Not Taken" is typical of Frost's work in that he tended to use traditional meters in his poems, but adhered to those meters loosely rather than strictly.

"The Road Not Taken" follows a strict ABAAB rhyme scheme.

In addition to the poem's regular use of end rhyme, it also makes irregular use of assonance. The vowel sound /ah/ (as in the word "and") repeats throughout lines 6-12, adding to the pleasing musicality of the verse.

While it was not out of the ordinary for Frost to use strict rhyme schemes of the sort present in "The Road Not Taken," it also wasn't universal—sometimes his use of rhyme could be erratic.

“The Road Not Taken” Speaker

The speaker of "The Road Not Taken" is anonymous and has no specified gender. While it's possible to argue that Frost himself is the speaker, there isn't definitive evidence that that is the case—and in fact, there is evidence to suggest that Frost may have based the speaker in this poem on his acquaintance Edward Thomas, whom Frost described as "a person who, whichever road he went, would be sorry he didn't go the other." Further, there is an ironic distance between what the speaker is saying in the poem and what the poem itself seems to be saying, further implying that Frost is not the same as the speaker.

The speaker, faced with a seemingly insignificant decision between two roads, makes a choice to follow the one that appears less worn—seemingly an argument against conformity—and then spends the rest of the poem reflecting on the decision. The poem ends with the speaker imagining him or herself in the distant future, reflecting back on the decision and believing that taking the road "less traveled [...] has made all the difference." The poem's ending reveals the speaker to be deeply concerned with the ways in which even small decisions may have far-reaching implications. However, by acknowledging in lines 9-12 that his or her decision was based on incomplete information, the speaker also acknowledges that the consequences of these decisions can rarely be predicted or controlled, and that it's often difficult to understand the meaning of one's choices in a broader context, even a long time after those decisions have been made.

The Road Not Taken

The poem takes place in a forest in autumn, after the leaves have begun to change color. More specifically, the poem takes place at a spot in the woods at which a road forks into two. The two roads continue on from the fork, but the roads soon pass out of sight as they wind and bend in the undergrowth of the forest. A person standing at the fork can see that one of the roads is a bit grassier than the other, but they are equally strewn with freshly fallen leaves, and in truth both roads appear to be about equally worn.

However, while it's accurate to say that the poem is set in a forest, it is equally accurate to say that the poem is set in the speaker's mind. Throughout the first three stanzas, the speaker is remembering the forest, the fork in the road, and making the decision to choose one rather than the other. And in the fourth and final stanza, the speaker imagines him or herself even further into the distant future, and looking back from that vantage in time to the moment of choosing the road in the wood.

This dual setting fits with the way that the poem seems to describe the speaker's straightforward decision about taking the less worn road in a wood, and also the way that the poem functions as an extended metaphor in which the speaker attempts to come to terms with a choice he or she made in the past.

Although Frost was an American poet, many of his earliest poems were written and published in England between 1912 and 1915. Frost didn't associate himself with any particular poetic school or movement, but when he began to publish work more widely in the United States in 1915—still very early in his career—the imagist poets were instrumental in helping to promote his work. Ezra Pound, for instance, favorably reviewed one of Frost's early collections (A Boy's Will), saying that Frost's style "has just this utter sincerity." Frost's poetry might also be broadly considered to be modernist.

"The Road Not Taken" appeared in 1916 as the first poem in a collection titled Mountain Interval. Mountain Interval, and "The Road Not Taken" along with it, were regarded as a turning point in Frost's career, marking a shift from his earlier poems (that were largely dramatic monologues or dialogues) to poems that were, as the Poetry Foundation describes them, "brief meditation[s] sparked by an object, person or event."

As in many of Frost's later poems, "The Road Not Taken" takes place in a pastoral setting in which the characters' actions take on symbolic significance to illustrate some general truth about human life. In a time when many of his contemporaries were turning away from the traditional verse practices of the 19th century, Frost was markedly more conservative in his technique, always using traditional meters. He was influenced by 19th-century Romantic poets (such as Keats) in both his subject matter and his thinking about craft, but he made his poems feel distinctly modern through his use of colloquial and everyday speech.

Frost wrote "The Road Not Taken" at the start of World War I, just before returning to the United States from England. As a poem about the impossibility of understanding the significance of one's life choices, "The Road Not Taken" can be read in the context of Frost's personal life, as he moved his family overseas, just as easily as it can be read in the context of world history, with a global war suddenly and unexpectedly erupting and upending people's lives. Take, for example, the case of Frost's friend, Edward Thomas, after whom Frost reportedly modeled the speaker of "The Road Not Taken." Thomas, after reading an advance copy of Frost's poem, decided to enlist in the army and died two years thereafter.

"The Most Misread Poem in America" — An insightful article in the Paris Review, which goes into depth about some of the different ways of reading (or misreading) "The Road Not Taken."

Robert Frost reads "The Road Not Taken" — Listen to Robert Frost read the poem.

Book Review: "The Road Not Taken," by David Orr — Those looking for an even more in-depth treatment of the poem might be interested in David Orr's book, "The Road Not Taken: Finding America in the Poem Everyone Loves and Almost Everyone Gets Wrong."

 

 

The Road Not Taken

Two roads diverged in a yellow wood,
And sorry I could not travel both
And be one traveler, long I stood
And looked down one as far as I could
To where it bent in the undergrowth;

Then took the other, as just as fair,
And having perhaps the better claim,
Because it was grassy and wanted wear;
Though as for that the passing there
Had worn them really about the same,

And both that morning equally lay
In leaves no step had trodden black.
Oh, I kept the first for another day!
Yet knowing how way leads on to way,
I doubted if I should ever come back.

I shall be telling this with a sigh
Somewhere ages and ages hence:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.

It was a scenario that every psychiatrist has learned to dread. You are in an office with somebody who is telling you that he or she has no reason or desire to live any longer. On one occasion when that happened, I was in-session with a woman roughly my own age. She was highly accomplished, well-liked by family and colleagues and, to an outsider, would certainly have seemed to have everything to live for. Yet, as we spoke about her feelings of depression and hopelessness, none of that seemed reason enough to stay alive. She had preselected a site in downtown Washington DC where she could drive off a bridge without her seatbelt on and have an accident that was sure to kill her and nobody else. What could I say to her to make a difference? It might seem strange that I would think about this person in connection with Robert Frost’s classic lyrical poem “Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening.”

Here is the poem:

Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening

Whose woods these are I think I know.
His house is in the village though;
He will not see me stopping here
To watch his woods fill up with snow.

My little horse must think it queer
To stop without a farmhouse near
Between the woods and frozen lake
The darkest evening of the year.

He gives his harness bells a shake
To ask if there is some mistake.
The only other sound’s the sweep
Of easy wind and downy flake.

The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep.

‘Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening’ is, after ‘The Road Not Taken’, Robert Frost’s best-known and best-loved poem. (Frost himself called it ‘my best bid for remembrance’.)

It seems a rather straightforward poem, but, as with that other Frost poem, its simplicity is only on the surface, and is belied here by several things, including the sophisticated rhyme pattern Frost employs. Before reading our analysis, we recommend reading ‘Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening’, which you can find here.

‘Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening’: summary

‘Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening’ is easy enough to summarise.

Frost passes some woods one evening during winter, and tells us that he thinks a man who owns the woods lives in the village some distance away. So the owner will not notice Frost stopping by to observe the snow falling upon the trees.

Next, Frost tells us that his horse probably thinks it odd that its rider has chosen to stop here, with no farmhouse around. What, surely they can’t bed down for the night here? As if registering its disbelief, the horse shakes its harness-bell as if to prompt an explanation from Frost. Everything else is silent around them, apart from the soft wind and the slight sound of snowfall.

Frost concludes ‘Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening’ by telling us that, lovely, dark, and inviting as the woods are, he has prior commitments that he must honour, so he must leave this place of peace and tranquillity and continue on his journey before he can sleep for the night.

‘Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening’: analysis

See? ‘Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening’ is easy enough to summarise or paraphrase. But this only goes so far in telling us what the poem means.

To interpret and perceive its deeper meaning, we need to consider the wider context of the poem, and what Frost is saying about the value of ‘stopping by woods on a snowy evening’ (why woods, and why snow, why the evening? and so on).

Everything is filled with a significance at once endorsed and belied by the poem’s language and Frost’s direct, matter-of-fact description of the scene.

The poem, if you will, wears its Romanticism lightly – but it is a Romantic poem, even while it is at the same time aware of the difficulties of Romantic awe in a modern, twentieth-century world (the poem was first published in 1923).

Consider that first stanza, as an example. It seems casual, setting the scene much as we might expect a poet to set about doing after the expectations generated by that title, ‘Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening’.

Yet it also reminds us that even our most seemingly pure encounter with the realness of nature is one mediated through an equally real world of economic and legal arrangements: these woods are not just ‘nature’, they are owned by someone who has every legal right to consider Frost a trespasser.

It’s as if Frost is transgressing merely by stopping to do something as weird as admire the beauty of the natural scene, the snow falling on the trees. Shouldn’t he be hurtling through as quickly as he can? Hasn’t he, like everyone else in the busy workaday world, got somewhere to get to?

Any analysis of ‘Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening’ should attend to the highly unusual and controlled rhyme scheme that Frost uses. For he doesn’t just employ a rhyme scheme: he links each stanza to the next through repeating the same rhymes at different points in the succeeding stanza.

So, although we might say ‘the rhyme scheme of “Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening” is aaba’ (an unusual rhyme scheme in itself, which Frost borrowed from the Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam), that only goes so far towards acknowledging the intricate way in which the stanzas are linked together. So in the first stanza, we get aaba (know … though … here … snow), but in the second stanza, we get bbcb (queer … near … lake … near); and then, in the third stanza, the ‘lake’ rhyme is shifted to become the ‘main’ rhyme, so we get ccdc (shake … mistake … sweep … flake).

In other words, the rhyme in the third line of each stanza becomes the rhyme of the first, second, and fourth lines in the next stanza. This lends the poem a sense of forward momentum, but at the same time, an air of inevitability, even world-weariness: this is not exactly an epiphanic moment, and the only openly affirmative statement (‘The woods are lovely’) is undercut immediately by the inevitable ‘But…’ (‘But I have promises to keep’).

But of course, this cannot go on indefinitely, and in the final stanza, the third line ends with the same rhyme as the other three lines, so we get deep … keep … sleep … sleep. Such repetition-as-rhyme – what I have called homorhyme in a study of modernist poetry (The Great War, The Waste Land and the Modernist Long PoemDescription: https://ir-uk.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=intereslitera-21&l=am2&o=2&a=1350027014) – conveys a sense of stasis, an inability to move on psychologically.

This is obviously at odds with what Frost is saying in this final stanza: namely, that he must get riding again and leave this peaceful, lovely scene behind.

As Terry Eagleton brilliantly puts it in an analysis of ‘Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening’ in his How to Read a PoemDescription: https://ir-uk.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=intereslitera-21&l=am2&o=2&a=1405151412, this is ‘rather like someone trying to shake himself out of the paralysis of sleep with the thought that he should get up.’

There’s also Frost’s use of regular iambic tetrameter throughout the poem, and his choice to end-stop each line: there’s no enjambment, there are no run-on lines, and this lends the poem an air of being a series of simple, pithy statements or observations, rather than a more profound meditation.

There’s something inevitable about it: it’s less a Wordsworthian ‘spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings’ than a more modern acknowledgment that most of us, as W. H. Davies put it in another poem from around this time, ‘have no time to stand and stare’ at nature. All we can do is snatch the odd moment, before someone (or something, even our horse) quietly suggests we might get back to what it is we’re supposed to be doing.

‘Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening’, then, is a much more complex poem than it first appears, making a careful analysis of how its language and rhyme pattern work together essential to understanding its meaning.

 

Robert Frost

Robert Frost (1874-1963) is regarded as one of the greatest American poets of the twentieth century. And yet he didn’t belong to any particular movement: unlike his contemporaries William Carlos Williams or Wallace Stevens he was not a modernist, preferring more traditional modes and utilising a more direct and less obscure poetic language. He famously observed of free verse, which was favoured by many modernist poets, that it was ‘like playing tennis with the net down’.

Many of his poems are about the natural world, with woods and trees featuring prominently in some of his most famous and widely anthologised poems (‘The Road Not Taken’, ‘Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening’, ‘Birches’, ‘Tree at My Window’). Elsewhere, he was fond of very short and pithy poetic statements: see ‘Fire and Ice’ and ‘But Outer Space’, for example.

Robert Frost was invited to read a poem at the inauguration of John F. Kennedy in 1961. However, as he prepared to read the poem he had written specially for the occasion, ‘For John F. Kennedy His Inauguration’, Frost found he was unable to read the words of his poem on the paper, so bright was the glare of the sun. So instead, he began to recite one of his earlier poems, from memory: ‘The Gift Outright’. Most critics agree that ‘The Gift Outright’ is a superior poem to the inauguration poem Frost had written, and ‘The Gift Outright’ is now more or less synonymous with Kennedy’s inauguration.

Sources:

·         https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_poems_by_Robert_Frost

·         Frost, Robert (1995). Poirier, Richard; Richardson, Mark (eds.). Collected Poems, Prose, & Plays. The Library of America. 81. New York: Library of America. ISBN 1-883011-06-X.