Derivational Morpheme in Grammar
In morphology, a derivational morpheme is
an affix that's added to a word to create a new word or a new form of a
word. Compare with inflectional morpheme.
Derivational morphemes can change the grammatical category (or part of speech) of a word. For example, adding -ful to beauty changes
the word from a noun to an adjective (beautiful),
while adding -(e)r to merge changes the
word from a verb to a noun (merger).
The form that results from the addition of a derivational
morpheme is called a derived word or a derivative.
"Derivational morphemes are used to change the grammatical
categories of words. For example, the derivational morpheme -er is
used to transform the verb bake into the noun baker. The morpheme -ly changes
the adjective quick into the adverb quickly. We can change adjectives
such as happy into nouns such as happiness by
using the derivational morpheme -ness. Other common suffixes
include -ism, -tion, -able, -ment and -al.
Derivational morphemes can also be prefixes, such as un-, in-, pre- and a-.
"Derivational morphemes can be added to free morphemes or to other derivational morphemes. For example, the verb transform consists of the root word form and the prefix trans-, a derivational morpheme. It can become the noun transformation by adding the derivational morpheme -ation.
"Derivational morphemes can be added to free morphemes or to other derivational morphemes. For example, the verb transform consists of the root word form and the prefix trans-, a derivational morpheme. It can become the noun transformation by adding the derivational morpheme -ation.
Derivational Morphemes and Meanings
"Derivational morphemes have clear semantic content. In
this sense they are like content words, except that they are not words.
. . . [W]hen a derivational morpheme is added to a base, it adds meaning. The derived word may also be of a different
grammatical class than the original word, as shown by suffixes such as -able and -ly.
When a verb is suffixed with -able, the result is an adjective, as
in desire + able. When the suffix -en is
added to an adjective, a verb is derived, as in dark + en.
One may form a noun from an adjective, as in sweet + ie."
(Victoria Fromkin, Robert Rodman, and Nina Hyams, An Introduction to Language, 10th ed. Cengage, 2013
(Victoria Fromkin, Robert Rodman, and Nina Hyams, An Introduction to Language, 10th ed. Cengage, 2013
Derivational Affixes
"Unlike the inflectional affixes, which number only eight
in English, the set of derivational affixes is open-ended; that is, there are a
potentially infinite number of them (although the number is finite at any one
time for a particular speaker). Since it would be impossible to enumerate them
exhaustively, let us look at a few representative examples. [In American English the] suffix -ize attaches
to a noun and turns it into the corresponding verb, as in criticize,
rubberize, vulcanize, pasteurize, mesmerize, and so on. (This suffix
can also be added to adjectives, as in normalize, realize, finalize,
vitalize, equalize, and so on.) The suffix -ful attaches
to a noun and turns it into the corresponding adjective, as in helpful,
playful, thoughtful, careful, and so on."
Inflectional Morphemes and Derivational
Morphemes
"Some inflectional endings . . . acquire characteristics
of derivational morphemes. These include -ed, -en, -er,
-ing and -ly. To make this clear, let us take an example.
The morpheme -er can function both as an inflectional morpheme
and as a derivational morpheme. As an inflectional morpheme, -er is
attached to adjectives to show the comparative as in hotter, describing
something as having a higher temperature. As a derivational morpheme, -er is
highly productive in forming new nouns. In this use, the
morpheme expresses mainly agenthood. It is attached to verbal roots to form
nouns as in camper, describing someone who performs the action
indicated by the verb. It is attached to adjectival roots to form nouns as
in teenager, describing someone as having the quality denoted by
the adjective.
It is attached to nominal roots to form nouns as in freighter,
describing a large ship or aircraft designed for carrying goods."
Meaning and Examples of Inflectional
Morphemes
In
English morphology, an inflectional morpheme is a suffix that's added to a word to assign a particular grammatical property to that word.
Inflectional
morphemes serve as grammatical markers that indicate tense, number, possession, or comparison. Inflectional morphemes in English include the bound morphemes -s (or -es); 's (or s'); -ed; -en; -er; -est;
and -ing.
Unlike derivational morphemes, inflectional morphemes do not change the
essential meaning or the grammatical category of a word.
- "[O]nly English nouns, verbs, adjectives, and adverbs--all open classes of words--take inflectional affixes. Closed classes of words . . . take no inflectional affixes in
English. Inflectional affixes always follow derivational ones if both
occur in a word, which makes sense if we think of inflections as affixes
on fully formed words. For example, the words antidisestablishmentarianism and uncompartmentalize each
contain a number of derivational affixes, and any inflectional affixes
must occur at the end: antidisestablishmentarianisms and uncompartmentalized.
"We can also see . . . that not only does English have few inflectional affixes but also that possessive, plural, and third-person singular are identical in form; they are all -s. The past participle affix -ed is also sometimes identical in form to the past tense affix, -ed. This lack of distinction in form dates back to the Middle English period (1100-1500 CE), when the more complex inflectional affixes found in Old English were slowly dropping out of the language for a variety of reasons . . .."
(Kristin Denham and Anne Lobeck, Linguistics for Everyone. Wadsworth, 2010)
- Inflectional Morphemes and
Derivational Morphemes
"The
difference between derivational and inflectional morphemes is worth
emphasizing. An inflectional morpheme never changes the grammatical categoryof a word. For example, both old and older are
adjectives. The -er inflection here (from Old English -ra) simply creates a different version of the
adjective. However, a derivational morpheme can change the grammatical category
of a word. The verb teach becomes the noun teacher if
we add the derivational morpheme -er (from Old English -ere).
So, the suffix -er in modern English can be an inflectional morpheme as part of an
adjective and also a distinct derivational morpheme as part of a noun. Just
because they look the same (-er) doesn't mean they do the same kind of
work.
"Whenever there is a derivational suffix and an inflectional suffix attached to the same word, they always appear in that order. First the derivational (-er) is attached to teach, then the inflectional (-s) is added to produce teachers."
"Whenever there is a derivational suffix and an inflectional suffix attached to the same word, they always appear in that order. First the derivational (-er) is attached to teach, then the inflectional (-s) is added to produce teachers."
Inflectional Morphemes and Meanings
"[W]hereas
a derivational morpheme relates more to the identity of a word itself (in that
it more directly affects the meaning of the stem), an inflectional morpheme relates the
word to the rest of the construction, motivating a position on the very
periphery of the word. . . .
"An inflectional morpheme does not have the capacity to change the meaning or the syntactic class of the words it is bound to and will have a predictable meaning for all such words. Thus, the present tense will mean the same thing regardless of the verb that is inflected, and the dative case will have the same value for all nouns. Semantic abstraction and relativity do not mean that there is little or simple meaning involved; inflectional categories are never merely automatic or semantically empty. The meanings of inflectional categories are certainly notoriously difficult to describe, but they exhibit all the normal behavior we expect from cognitive categories, such as grounding in embodied experience and radial structured polysemy (see Janda 1993)."
(Laura Janda, "Inflectional Morphology."
"An inflectional morpheme does not have the capacity to change the meaning or the syntactic class of the words it is bound to and will have a predictable meaning for all such words. Thus, the present tense will mean the same thing regardless of the verb that is inflected, and the dative case will have the same value for all nouns. Semantic abstraction and relativity do not mean that there is little or simple meaning involved; inflectional categories are never merely automatic or semantically empty. The meanings of inflectional categories are certainly notoriously difficult to describe, but they exhibit all the normal behavior we expect from cognitive categories, such as grounding in embodied experience and radial structured polysemy (see Janda 1993)."
(Laura Janda, "Inflectional Morphology."
No comments:
Post a Comment