Monday, October 25, 2021

Bhiksu University of Sri Lanka External Degree Program Anuradhapura English Literature-E/ENGL 2024 Anne Ranasinghe

Discussion-5

Anne Ranasinghe highlights cruelty, inhumanity and violence through her poems. Discuss with reference to at least three poems composed by her.

  On the Beach

On the Beach’ describes a cruel incident that happened on the beach. It is seen some boys making fun of a puppy by torturing it on the sand. Though the poem is a simple one to read, there are multiple layers of meaning. The simple yet disturbing context of the poem reveals a harsh truth. From an early age, humans have this basic urge to laugh at someone’s distress. Philosophers across the globe throw light on this dark side of the human mind and think every human has this inherent dark side. However, the motive behind writing this poem is to alert young readers not to indulge in such inhumane acts. On the Beach’ is a poem written by the Sri Lankan poet Anne Ranasinghe. It concerns how men drive sadistic pleasure from torturing an innocent. This poem takes place on the beach in clear daylight. In this poem’s context, three boys and a puppy are there. Those boys have a rope and a stick to torture that innocence. What is mere “play” for them, becomes insufferable torture for the innocent animal that doesn’t even have the ability to yelp. However, the poem ends on a horrid note. Ranasinghe writes, “They cry let’s/ play/ At burying him/ And then/ They bury him.” Readers can sense what might have happened with the helpless creature.

This poem is 31 lines long and has uneven line-length. Some lines describing the plot are long and some lines are comparably short. Those short lines are meant for emphasizing the words especially. As an example, in the last section of the poem, the word “play” stands alone in a line. Here, the poet emphasizes this word and depicts a symbolic meaning. Apart from that, it is a free verse poem without having any specific rhyme. The flow of the poem gets maintained by the use of internal rhymings. However, the poem is mostly composed of iambic feet.

 Literary Devices

The poet begins her poem with a metaphor in the phrase, “the crash/ Of the morning waves.” Thereafter, she uses personifies in the following line. Here, she personifies the “sunlight”. Anne also uses metonymy in this poem. As an example, the “rope” is a metonym for torture. Moreover, there is a synecdoche in the line, “And helpless anger.” Here, the poet presents the abstract idea, “anger” to portray the helplessly angry creature suffering on the beach. Apart from that, from line 16 to line 18, the poet presents anaphora. There is an allusion to the holocaust in the line, “The alien years.” The poem ends with the use of alliteration and irony as well.

The poem begins by directly presenting the plot of the poem that is the sea beach. The use of the words “crash”, “drown”, and “yelps” create the tone and mood of the poem. However, in the first section of ‘On the Beach’, the poet depicts “Three boys, one puppy” and “A rope.” Those boys are torturing the helpless puppy. As an effect, it yelps haplessly on the beach. However, the poet ironically says that neither the crashing waves nor the sound of the wind can drown its yelps. After reading the next few sections of the poem, readers will get to know that the waves and the wind have drowned its voice. Whatsoever, this section contains an ironic representation of the cruel act that happened on the beach. “The sand fills his ears.” In the following section of the poem, Ranasinghe says that the creature’s agony rips dark holes in the eyes of the torturers. It means that such a pathetic incident can hurt a person deeply. Moreover, the poet says the helpless creature twists on the hand of those boys as they noose the rope tighter. Along with that, they beat the puppy with a thin stick. Each time the blow strikes harder. This sadistic act does not stop here. They even throw sand on it until the sand fills its eyes, nose, and ears.

At the end of the previous section, the poet makes a personal commentary on what is happening in the poem, ‘On the Beach’. Here, she dispassionately says though its eyes are filled with tears, the tears taste salty in her mouth. So, the speaker was also a victim of such an incident or some other incident like this in the past. For this reason, her “alien years” have rotted her tongue into immobility. She becomes speechless whenever she comes across such an action happening in front of her.

However, the speaker says people swim in the sunlit sea just like it is an ordinary day. They don’t even care what is happening on the beach. In the last section, Ranasinghe shifts to the act of oppression mentioned in the first section. After throwing sand on the puppy, the boys say to each other, “Let’s play.” They don’t even know what they are doing. For them, it’s just a plaything. At last, they bury the helpless creature alive!

 ‘On the Beach’ is a poem by Anne Ranasinghe. She was born in a Jewish family and her name was Anneliese Katz. During the holocaust, she left Nazi Germany and took shelter at her aunt’s in England. When World War II broke out her parents got killed by the Nazis. However, later she moved to Sri Lanka. She established her career there. Whatsoever, being a victim of the holocaust, the episodes of her life had a deep impression on her mind. This poem reflects this tension in the poet’s mind. Moreover, the imaginary plot of the poem depicts the reality of the holocaust in Nazi Germany. Last but not least, through this poem Ranasinghe describes how that horrid incident during World War II made the victims cold at heart and numb at an emotional level. Anne Ranasinghe(Anneliese Katz) who was a Jewish by birth was born in 1925 in Germany. She was a victim of Nazi violence against Jewish in Germany. In the literary world Anne Ranasinghe is known as a holocaust writer. Here in her poem “At What Dark Point” she brings out the idea of unpredictability of violence in a more evocative manner.


The poem “At What Dark Point” sets in a lush and rich almost romantic background with a regular scenery where a stranger sitting under the Araliya in the poet’s path and twisting the strands of a rope. At once it brings innocence and beauty in life yet the poet juxtaposes the idea with sinister and evil dormant. Suddenly the romantic verdant setting moves into a somber. The mechanical routine of the action has suddenly been transformed, rousing evil without any volition of the doer. This is what the poet experienced with a strong sense of genocide, it was her known world with the people who she had the trust, faith and reliance suddenly metamorphosed into a mind-boggling horrific world of violence and brutality. It is her memory of Holocaust that triggers in her mind. The present scenery evokes her horrific past and inviolate in her consciousness.


“And seeing him sit day after day,

sinister, silence, twisting his rope

to a future purpose of evilness

I sense the charred- wood smell again”

 

With the innocent action of the man she was potent with a signal of horror come in. It was the Nazi attack where humanity was reduced to beasts and there was no possibility of love and reason. “Animal fear” suggests the fact that hunting for prey. She smells the burning down of the beautiful synagogue and the blood thirst of the hunters. Moreover she depicts the picture with a sound effect “echoing thud” she extends her experience by foregrounding her memory to the human context.

Yet as a whole the poem conveys the deep pessimism of the poet. Neither the technological achievements nor cultural facts can safeguard for the primeval instincts of the humans.

 

At What Dark Point

Every morning I see him


sitting in speckled shade

of blossom laden araliya tree

which I planted many years ago

in my garden, and it branches now

have spread in our lane.

Under my tree in a shadow of silence

he sit, and with log skeletal hands

sorts of strands from a tangle of juten fibres

and twisting, twisting makes a rope

that grows. And grows. Each day.

Every morning I pass him. He sits

in the golden – haze brightness under

my tree. Sits

on the edge of his silence twisting

his lengthening rope and

watching

me.

And seeing him sit day after day,

sinister, silent, twisting his rope

to a future purpose of evilness

I sense the charred-wood smell again

Stained glass exploding in the flames

( a firework of fractured glass

against the black November sky)

the streets deserted, all doors shut

at twelve o’ clock at night, and running with animal fear

between high houses shuttered tight

the jackboot ringing hard and clear

while stalking with the lust for blood.

I can still hear

the ironed heel – its echoing thud-

and still can taste the cold-winter-taste

of charred-wood-midnight-fear

knowing

that nothing is impossible

that nothing is impossible

that anything is possible

that there is no safety

in words or houses

that boundaries are theoretical

and love is relative

to the choice before you.

I know that anything is impossible

anytime. There is no safety

in poems or music or even in

Philosophy. No safety

in houses or temples

of any faith.

And no one knows

at what dark point the time will come again

blood and knives, terror and pain

of jackboots and twisted strand of rope

And the impress of a child’s small hand

paroxysmic mark on an oven wall

scratched death mark on an oven wall

is my child’s hand.

Some looming clouds of gloom are incrementally enveloping our paradise isle very vividly and palpably and the writer is compelled to suppose that the whole nation is at some dark point in her history that has to be arrested at any cost. At what dark point, we have to be deciphered by the intelligentsia of the country with the least delay because of the very fact that when the die is cast the situation would be ‘no turning, no stopping’ an ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure.

The student violence in the so called big schools is an ill omen. If it goes spiraling, the whole school system would embroil in an ugly foray. This is an unprecedented situation. It would be a Herculean task for the rulers who have some other fish to fry. Modern generation seems to be very immature. They are driven by sudden emotions. The solution has to bear social sensitivity. In a village school, the higher authorities nip it in the bud, but the names of the schools signal the level of the parents.

The other day, some of the national newspapers reported that a junior prefect of a school in Kandy had been severely assaulted and intimidated by a senior prefect of the same school. The reason behind that is not the concern here, but the gravity of the situation with regard to student violence in the school system. Once the writer read in a newspaper that a teacher in a school in England had been molested by some students for keeping them after school for not doing homework. So, the situation seems to be global and developed out of proportion. The big match season is another nuisance and a root cause for students’ violence. Yet, it has to be viewed sans malicious sentiments. Opposing everything, dwelling in the traditional mindset is not the solution. It has to be done on expert guidance.

Ethnic violence

Literature written on ethnic violence is vast. The nostalgic memories of the writers have resulted in good literature in every genre. The late Anne Ranasinghe’s poetry speaks volumes in this regard. The disgruntled politicians and racist maniacs are at the forefront to hamper any development towards ethnic harmony. I wonder if ethnic violence would raise its ugly head again what could be the ultimate outcome? Under these circumstances reconciliation efforts of the country ought to be propelled at any cost.

It goes without saying that country is debt-ridden to the bottom. The huge amounts of local borrowing and foreign debts have to be paid off. But, we hear every day on the Central Bank grapevine that the country is in a treacherous bog of financial disarray. It seems a Herculean task for the governor to shoulder. Some others could invent and fabricate fairy tales to the public as they are politically motivated to remain in power. The governor has to bear the cross and have faith; the people have to tighten their belts. The late professor Indrarathne and other veteran economists in the bygone era of country’s economic resurgence candidly showed the way forward for us. Dr. N. M . Perera’s far sighted economic planning to increase productivity and curtail import of luxurious goods to the country was scrapped poignantly and very ironically. He made the country debt-free to a great extent.

It seems very advisable to take a leaf from his book and seek solace in this disgraceful economic ordeal. A productivity driven economic system curtailing unnecessary imports seems mandatory. Our honourble members of the parliament would definitely wait for some time to enjoy the duty free benefits to own a new car to visit the constituents with the sublime aim of serving them.

The street protests do not seem augur well for country’s progress. The opposing factions always claim for the right pound of flesh. The problems are aggravated by the relevant MPs and ministers of our August Assembly making the situation unbearable for the Government to solve. During the halcyon days of our parliament in the post-independence period, the honourable members and responsible ministers appeared in the house well prepared to answer any question. It is only history now. When the well-educated parliamentarians were on their feet, it was a scene to enjoy and something to listen and learn.

When the late Anura Bandaranaike was on his feet, it was something to learn and revise from HAMLET. The most veteran minister of finance the country has ever seen honourable Ronie de Mel once said ‘SUPERSTION IS THE RELIGION OF FEEBLE MINDS’. Informative, educational, literary eloquent, farsighted, visionary and humorous speeches made by the iconic parliamentarians could be the lessons for the novice of the current parliament if by chance they visit their library as our well-read prime minister reminds them over and over again.

The oral questions that the members of our house ask to be answered by the relevant ministers seem very unimportant. The country is burning and they questions on very impertinent subjects. They are given humorous answers and the tax payer foots the bill. The parliament canteen seems to be their rendezvous to plan speeches for public ralleys. It seems that they make public utterances with mutual understanding. That is the name of the game. At what dark point our paradise island is?

small screen

The monks wearing their saffron robe could be seen very frequently on the pillion of their friends’ motor cycles. Monks are highly venerated in our society. Their reverence and dignity seem to have eroded due to such irrational conduct in the public eye. One could argue on this matter very eloquently. But, the crux of the matter is that they have already earned that ill reputation in the public mind indelibly.

Another recent development is that the actors who are known by the public for their known and unknown conduct are draped in the sacred robes for aesthetic performances on the small screen in particular and on the silver screen in general. In the contemporary period of our great playwright William Shakespeare, even women were not allowed to perform on the stage. But, the playwrights were capable enough to dress men for women. As a regular viewer of tele-opera I have never seen the religious dignitaries of other faiths acting in their clerical garbs. When we put this situation in juxtaposition one could feel it odd. In the long run, this offshoot of monk actors would pave the way for another cultural crisis, the writer laments, the writer is in a state of aphasia.

The other day, the writer pointed out in the national press a grave error the examination department had made in the G.C.E. A/L English literature question paper. It has fallen into deaf ears.

The defective question papers, leaking, pilferage, not representing the given parts in the syllabus and a plethora of accusations against the question paper modeling panels could be leveled with available data. The curriculum development should necessarily be geared to productivity development of the country. But, very poignantly these things lie stagnant at the relevant places.

To clinch over, a comprehensive cleansing of all the aspects of government machinery and public awareness of the ongoing changes are of paramount importance to look forward to. The delay in taking decisions would create calamitous effects leading the whole country to a total collapse and a moral paralysis. This is the time to turn the swords into ploughshares. 

           
Plead Mercy

We pass a bullock yoked to a cart
Straining uphill. He shivers
With effort, his bones
Protrude and the taut skin quivers
At each whip of sharp-throned stick
There is no expression on his face
Only his eyes plead mercy
Foam slavers from his lips
As he travails to increase his pace
And slips. My daughter asks
Does he think life is worth living?

I tell her what I know
Is not true, that life
Is always better than death
She frowns
If there is revolution, she says
I'll kill myself. All those horrible things
They do to people
The bullock has fallen on the rough
Edge of the road, He tries
But in spite of the
Stick he cannot rise
Lord have mercy on his eyes
My daughter is just thirteen.

Anne Ranasinghe, a German lady who had experienced revolution and its horrible effects in her own country, seems to make an appeal to the Buddhist philosophy to find out an answer to the larger issues of the younger generation.

By birth she was German but later married a Sri Lankan and has written many poems to the Sri Lankan poetry lovers.

In this poem the writer presents a very common theme, that is cruelty to the animals. She selects the situation of a bullock cart where the carter inhumanly beats the bull, until it falls down; unable to move a step further.

'As he travails to increase his pace and slips.'

The pathetic scene is watched by the poet and her daughter who questions her mother and is not satisfied with the answer she gets.

Anne Ranasinghe clearly brings out the inhuman qualities of human beings. The bull is begging for mercy from his master with his eyes and he is insensitive to the pleas of his own animal.

The daughter becomes sensitive to the painful suffering experienced by the animal while the carter is not.

The girl represents the innocent merciful younger generation while the carter represents the merciless adult world. The mother is between these two. She is conscious of the girl's natural feelings and troubled by her age. She wonders about her daughter.

However, "Sabbe Sattha Bhavanthu Sukhitattha" this epigraph is taken from the Buddhist scripture which means 'May all beings be free from sorrow and pain' makes us aware of our Sri Lankan Buddhist culture which forbids any kind of torture and cruelty to all living beings. This is a common wish of the Buddhists.

In a primarily Buddhist country such as Sri Lanka, the Pali line is frequently uttered, it being associated with one of the principal teachings of Buddhism - loving kindness. But the irony of it is that in Sri Lanka, cruelty to animals and inhumanity prevail.

This is presented very dramatically through a single episode where a thirteen-year-old girl who witnesses the scene, questions her mother:

'Does he think life is worth living?' which means 'Is life worth living if it's full of such suffering?' Mother tells 'that life is always better than death'. But the daughter is not satisfied with the answer she gets. The mother who has experienced such cruelties committed upon animals is helpless and all she can do is to plead mercy and pray that human beings become compassionate and merciful.

Sources:

http://archives.sundayobserver.lk/2008/03/16/mag05.asp

http://www.scholarspark.com/at-what-dark-point-by-anne-ranasinghe.html

https://www.dailynews.lk/2017/08/17/features/125431/what-dark-point

Friday, October 22, 2021

Thursday, October 14, 2021

D.N. Aloysius

(BA/PGDE/MA/M.Phil/ Ph. D Thesis Completed/LL.B Level-3/4 -English Medium)

Visiting Lecturer in English Language Teaching Methodology and Supervisor

Postgraduate Diploma in Education Unit

Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities

Rajarata University of Sri Lanka

Mihintale

Sri Lanka

 

D.N. Aloysius

(BA/PGDE/MA/M.Phil/ Ph. D Thesis Completed/LL.B Level-3/4 -English Medium)

Visiting Lecturer in English Literature

External Degree Program

Bhiksu University of Sri Lanka

Anuradhapura

Sri Lanka

 

D.N. Aloysius

(BA/PGDE/MA/M.Phil/ Ph. D Thesis Completed/LL.B Level-3/4 -English Medium)

Head

Aloysius College

Anuradhapura

Bhiksu University of Sri Lanka External Degree Program Anuradhapura English Literature-E/ENGL 1024

 Buddhist Literature: Life of the Buddha: Discussion-5

Write a brief account on the Life of the Buddha referring to the main events in his life.

The Buddha, or Siddhartha Gautama, was born around 567 B.C.E., in a small kingdom just below the Himalayan foothills. His father was a chief of the Shakya clan. It is said that twelve years before his birth the brahmins prophesied that he would become either a universal monarch or a great sage. To prevent him from becoming an ascetic, his father kept him within the confines of the palace. Gautama grew up in princely luxury, shielded from the outside world, entertained by dancing girls, instructed by brahmins, and trained in archery, swordsmanship, wrestling, swimming, and running. When he came of age he married Gopa, who gave birth to a son. He had, as we might say today, everything.

And yet, it was not enough. Something—something as persistent as his own shadow—drew him into the world beyond the castle walls. There, in the streets of Kapilavastu, he encountered three simple things: a sick man, an old man, and a corpse being carried to the burning grounds. Nothing in his life of ease had prepared him for this experience. When his charioteer told him that all beings are subject to sickness, old age, and death, he could not rest.

As he returned to the palace, he passed a wandering ascetic walking peacefully along the road, wearing the robe and carrying the single bowl of a sadhu. He then resolved to leave the palace in search of the answer to the problem of suffering. After bidding his wife and child a silent farewell without waking them, he rode to the edge of the forest. There, he cut his long hair with his sword and exchanged his fine clothes for the simple robes of an ascetic.

Finding Liberation

With these actions Siddhartha Gautama joined a whole class of men who had dropped out of Indian society to find liberation. There were a variety of methods and teachers, and Gautama investigated many—atheists, materialists, idealists, and dialecticians. The deep forest and the teeming marketplace were alive with the sounds of thousands of arguments and opinions, unlike in our time.

Gautama finally settled down to work with two teachers. From Arada Kalama, who had three hundred disciples, he learned how to discipline his mind to enter the sphere of nothingness. But even though Arada Kalama asked him to remain and teach as an equal, he recognized that this was not liberation, and left. Next Siddhartha learned how to enter the concentration of mind which is neither consciousness nor unconsciousness from Udraka Ramaputra. But neither was this liberation and Siddhartha left his second teacher.

For six years Siddhartha along with five companions practiced austerities and concentration. He drove himself mercilessly, eating only a single grain of rice a day, pitting mind against body. His ribs stuck through his wasted flesh and he seemed more dead than alive. 

The Middle Path

His five companions left him after he made the decision to take more substantial food and to abandon asceticism. Then, Siddhartha entered a village in search of food.  There, a woman named Sujata offered him a dish of milk and a separate vessel of honey. His strength returned, Siddhartha washed himself in the Nairanjana River, and then set off to the Bodhi tree. He spread a mat of kusha grass underneath, crossed his legs and sat.

He sat, having listened to all the teachers, studied all the sacred texts and tried all the methods. Now there was nothing to rely on, no one to turn to, nowhere to go. He sat solid and unmoving and determined as a mountain, until finally, after six days, his eye opened on the rising morning star, so it is said, and he realized that what he had been looking for had never been lost, neither to him nor to anyone else. Therefore there was nothing to attain, and no longer any struggle to attain it.

“Wonder of wonders,” he is reported to have said, “this very enlightenment is the nature of all beings, and yet they are unhappy for lack of it.” So it was that Siddhartha Gautama woke up at the age of thirty-five, and became the Buddha, the Awakened One, known as Shakyamuni, the sage of the Shakyas.

For seven weeks he enjoyed the freedom and tranquillity of liberation. At first he had no inclination to speak about his realization. He felt would be too difficult for most people to understand. But when, according to legend, Brahma, chief of the three thousand worlds, requested that the Awakened One teach, since there were those “whose eyes were only a little clouded over,” the Buddha agreed.

The First Noble Truth

Shakyamuni’s two former teachers, Udraka and Arada Kalama, had both died only a few days earlier, and so he sought the five ascetics who had left him. When they saw him approaching the Deer Park in Benares they decided to ignore him, since he had broken his vows. Yet they found something so radiant about his presence that they rose, prepared a seat, bathed his feet and listened as the Buddha turned the wheel of the dharma, the teachings, for the first time.

Related: What are The Four Noble Truths?

The First Noble Truth of the Buddha stated that all life, all existence, is characterized by duhkha. The Sanskrit word meaning suffering, pain, unsatisfactoriness. Even moments of happiness have a way of turning into pain when we hold onto them, or, once they have passed into memory, they twist the present as the mind makes an inevitable, hopeless attempt to recreate the past. The teaching of the Buddha is based on direct insight into the nature of existence. Ir is a radical critique of wishful thinking and the myriad tactics of escapism—whether through political utopianism, psychological therapeutics, simple hedonism, or (and it is this which primarily distinguishes Buddhism from most of the world’s religions) the theistic salvation of mysticism.

Suffering is true

Duhkha is Noble, and it is true. It is a foundation, a stepping stone, to be comprehended fully, not to be escaped from or explained. The experience of duhkha, of the working of one’s mind, leads to the Second Noble Truth, the origin of suffering, traditionally described as craving, thirsting for pleasure, but also and more fundamentally a thirst for continued existence, as well as nonexistence. Examination of the nature of this thirst leads to the heart of the Second Noble Truth, the idea of the “self,” or “I,” with all its desires, hopes, and fears, and it is only when this self is comprehended and seen to be insubstantial that the Third Noble Truth, the cessation of suffering, is realized.

The first sangha

The five ascetics who listened to the Buddha ‘s first discourse in the Deer Park became the nucleus of a community, a sangha, of men (women were to enter later) who followed the way the Buddha had described in his Fourth Noble Truth, the Noble Eightfold Path. These bhikshus, or monks, lived simply, owning a bowl, a robe, a needle, a water strainer, and a razor, since they shaved their heads as a sign of having left home. They traveled around northeastern India, practicing meditation alone or in small groups, begging for their meals.

The Noble Eightfold Path

The Buddha’s teaching, however, was not only for the monastic community. Shakyamuni had instructed them to bring it to all: “Go ye, O bhikshus, for the gain of the many, the welfare of the many, in compassion for the world, for the good, for the gain, for the welfare of gods and men.”

For the next forty-nine years Shakyamuni walked through the villages and towns of India, speaking in the vernacular, using common figures of speech that everyone could understand. He taught a villager to practice mindfulness while drawing water from a well, and when a distraught mother asked him to heal the dead child she carried in her arms, he did not perform a miracle, but instead instructed her to bring him a mustard seed from a house where no one had ever died. She returned from her search without the seed, but with the knowledge that death is universal.

Death and Impermanence

As the Buddha’s fame spread, kings and other wealthy patrons donated parks and gardens for retreats.  The Buddha accepted these, but he continued to live as he had ever since his twenty-ninth year: as a wandering sadhu, begging his own meal, spending his days in meditation. Only now there was one difference. Almost every day, after his noon meal, the Buddha taught. None of these discourses, or the questions and answers that followed, were recorded during the Buddha’s lifetime.

The Buddha died in the town of Kushinagara, at the age of eighty, having eaten a meal of pork or mushrooms. Some of the assembled monks were despondent, but the Buddha, lying on his side, with his head resting on his right hand, reminded them that everything is impermanent, and advised them to take refuge in themselves and the dharma—the teaching. He asked for questions a last time. There were none. Then he spoke his final words: “Now then, bhikshus, I address you: all compound things are subject to decay; strive diligently.”

The first rainy season after the Buddha’s parinirvana, it is said that five hundred elders gathered at a mountain cave near Rajagriha, where they held the First Council. Ananda, who had been the Buddha’s attendant, repeated all the discourses, or sutras, he had heard, and Upali recited the two hundred fifty monastic rules, the Vinaya, while Mahakashyapa recited the Abhidharma, the compendium of Buddhist psychology and metaphysics.  These three collections, which were written on palm leaves a few centuries later and known as the Tripitaka (literally “three baskets”), became the basis for all subsequent versions of the Buddhist canon.

The rise of these cities of central India, with their courts and their commerce, brought social, political, and economic changes that are often identified as key factors in the rise of Buddhism and other religious movements of the 6th and 5th centuries bce. Buddhist texts identify a variety of itinerant teachers who attracted groups of disciples. Some of these taught forms of meditation, Yoga, and asceticism and set forth philosophical views, focusing often on the nature of the person and the question of whether human actions (karma) have future effects. Although the Buddha would become one of these teachers, Buddhists view him as quite different from the others. His place within the tradition, therefore, cannot be understood by focusing exclusively on the events of his life and times (even to the extent that they are available). Instead, he must be viewed within the context of Buddhist theories of time and history.

According to Buddhist doctrine, the universe is the product of karma, the law of the cause and effect of actions, according to which virtuous actions create pleasure in the future and nonvirtuous actions create pain. The beings of the universe are reborn without beginning in six realms: as gods, demigods, humans, animals, ghosts, and hell beings. The actions of these beings create not only their individual experiences but the domains in which they dwell. The cycle of rebirth, called samsara (literally “wandering”), is regarded as a domain of suffering, and the ultimate goal of Buddhist practice is to escape from that suffering. The means of escape remains unknown until, over the course of millions of lifetimes, a person perfects himself, ultimately gaining the power to discover the path out of samsara and then compassionately revealing that path to the world.

A person who has set out on the long journey to discover the path to freedom from suffering, and then to teach it to others, is called a bodhisattva. A person who has discovered that path, followed it to its end, and taught it to the world is called a buddha. Buddhas are not reborn after they die but enter a state beyond suffering called nirvana (literally “passing away”). Because buddhas appear so rarely over the course of time and because only they reveal the path to liberation (moksha) from suffering (dukkha), the appearance of a buddha in the world is considered a momentous event in the history of the universe.

The story of a particular buddha begins before his birth and extends beyond his death. It encompasses the millions of lives spent on the bodhisattva path before the achievement of buddhahood and the persistence of the buddha, in the form of both his teachings and his relics, after he has passed into nirvana. The historical Buddha is regarded as neither the first nor the last buddha to appear in the world. According to some traditions he is the 7th buddha; according to another he is the 25th; according to yet another he is the 4th. The next buddha, named Maitreya, will appear after Shakyamuni’s teachings and relics have disappeared from the world. The traditional accounts of the events in the life of the Buddha must be considered from this perspective.

Sources of the life of the Buddha

Accounts of the life of the Buddha appear in many forms. Perhaps the earliest are those found in the collections of sutras (Pali: suttas), discourses traditionally attributed to the Buddha. In the sutras, the Buddha recounts individual events in his life that occurred from the time that he renounced his life as a prince until he achieved enlightenment six years later. Several accounts of his enlightenment also appear in the sutras. One Pali text, the Mahaparinibbana-sutta (“Discourse on the Final Nirvana”), describes the Buddha’s last days, his passage into nirvana, his funeral, and the distribution of his relics. Biographical accounts in the early sutras provide little detail about the Buddha’s birth and childhood, although some sutras contain a detailed account of the life of a prehistoric buddha, Vipashyin.

Another category of early Buddhist literature, the vinaya (concerned ostensibly with the rules of monastic discipline), contains accounts of numerous incidents from the Buddha’s life but rarely in the form of a continuous narrative; biographical sections that do occur often conclude with the conversion of one of his early disciples, Shariputra. While the sutras focus on the person of the Buddha (his previous lives, his practice of austerities, his enlightenment, and his passage into nirvana), the vinaya literature tends to emphasize his career as a teacher and the conversion of his early disciples. The sutras and vinaya texts, thus, reflect concerns with both the Buddha’s life and his teachings, concerns that often are interdependent; early biographical accounts appear in doctrinal discourses, and points of doctrine and places of pilgrimage are legitimated through their connection to the life of the Buddha.

Near the beginning of the Common Era, independent accounts of the life of the Buddha were composed. They do not recount his life from birth to death, often ending with his triumphant return to his native city of Kapilavastu (Pali: Kapilavatthu), which is said to have taken place either one year or six years after his enlightenment. The partial biographies add stories that were to become well-known, such as the child prince’s meditation under a rose-apple tree and his four momentous chariot rides outside the city.

These accounts typically make frequent reference to events from the previous lives of the Buddha. Indeed, collections of stories of the Buddha’s past lives, called Jatakas, form one of the early categories of Buddhist literature. Here, an event reminds the Buddha of an event in a past life. He relates that story in order to illustrate a moral maxim, and, returning to the present, he identifies various members of his audience as the present incarnations of characters in his past-life tale, with himself as the main character.

The Jataka stories (one Pali collection contains 547 of them) have remained among the most popular forms of Buddhist literature. They are the source of some 32 stone carvings at the 2nd-century bce stupa at Bharhut in northeastern Madhya Pradesh state; 15 stupa carvings depict the last life of the Buddha. Indeed, stone carvings in India provide an important source for identifying which events in the lives of the Buddha were considered most important by the community. The Jataka stories are also well-known beyond India; in Southeast Asia, the story of Prince Vessantara (the Buddha’s penultimate reincarnation)—who demonstrates his dedication to the virtue of charity by giving away his sacred elephant, his children, and finally his wife—is as well-known as that of his last lifetime.

Lives of the Buddha that trace events from his birth to his death appeared in the 2nd century ce. One of the most famous is the Sanskrit poem Buddhacharita (“Acts of the Buddha”) by Ashvaghosa. Texts such as the Mulasarvastivada Vinaya (probably dating from the 4th or 5th century ce) attempt to gather the many stories of the Buddha into a single chronological account. The purpose of these biographies in many cases is less to detail the unique deeds of Shakyamuni’s life than to demonstrate the ways in which the events of his life conform to a pattern that all buddhas of the past have followed. According to some, all past buddhas had left the life of the householder after observing the four sights, all had practiced austerities, all had achieved enlightenment at Bodh Gaya, all had preached in the deer park at Sarnath, and so on.

The life of the Buddha was written and rewritten in India and across the Buddhist world, elements added and subtracted as necessary. Sites that became important pilgrimage places but that had not been mentioned in previous accounts would be retrospectively sanctified by the addition of a story about the Buddha’s presence there. Regions that Buddhism entered long after his death—such as Sri Lanka, Kashmir, and Burma (now Myanmar)—added narratives of his magical visitations to accounts of his life.

No single version of the life of the Buddha would be accepted by all Buddhist traditions. For more than a century, scholars have focused on the life of the Buddha, with the earliest investigations attempting to isolate and identify historical elements amid the many legends. Because of the centuries that had passed between the actual life and the composition of what might be termed a full biography, most scholars abandoned this line of inquiry as unfruitful. Instead they began to study the processes—social, political, institutional, and doctrinal—responsible for the regional differences among the narratives of the Buddha. The various uses made of the life of the Buddha are another topic of interest. In short, the efforts of scholars have shifted from an attempt to derive authentic information about the life of the Buddha to an effort to trace stages in and the motivations for the development of his biography.

It is important to reiterate that the motivation to create a single life of the Buddha, beginning with his previous births and ending with his passage into nirvana, occurred rather late in the history of Buddhism. Instead, the biographical tradition of the Buddha developed through the synthesis of a number of earlier and independent fragments. And biographies of the Buddha have continued to be composed over the centuries and around the world. During the modern period, for example, biographies have been written that seek to demythologize the Buddha and to emphasize his role in presaging modern ethical systems, social movements, or scientific discoveries. What follows is an account of the life of the Buddha that is well-known, yet synthetic, bringing together some of the more famous events from various accounts of his life, which often describe and interpret these events differently.

Many biographies of the Buddha begin not with his birth in his last lifetime but in a lifetime millions of years before, when he first made the vow to become a buddha. According to a well-known version, many aeons ago there lived a Brahman named (in some accounts) Sumedha, who realized that life is characterized by suffering and then set out to find a state beyond death. He retired to the mountains, where he became a hermit, practiced meditation, and gained yogic powers. While flying through the air one day, he noticed a great crowd around a teacher, whom Sumedha learned was the buddha Dipamkara. When he heard the word buddha he was overcome with joy. Upon Dipamkara’s approach, Sumedha loosened his yogin’s matted locks and laid himself down to make a passage across the mud for the Buddha. Sumedha reflected that were he to practice the teachings of Dipamkara he could free himself from future rebirth in that very lifetime. But he concluded that it would be better to delay his liberation in order to traverse the longer path to buddhahood; as a buddha he could lead others across the ocean of suffering to the farther shore. Dipamkara paused before Sumedha and predicted that many aeons hence this yogin with matted locks would become a buddha. He also prophesied Sumedha’s name in his last lifetime (Gautama) and the names of his parents and chief disciples and described the tree under which the future Buddha would sit on the night of his enlightenment.

Over the subsequent aeons, the bodhisattva would renew his vow in the presence of each of the buddhas who came after Dipamkara, before becoming the buddha Shakyamuni himself. Over the course of his lifetimes as a bodhisattva, he accumulated merit (punya) through the practice of 6 (or 10) virtues. After his death as Prince Vessantara, he was born in the Tusita Heaven, whence he surveyed the world to locate the proper site of his final birth.

He determined that he should be born the son of the king Shuddhodana of the Shakya clan, whose capital was Kapilavastu. Shortly thereafter, his mother, the queen Maha Maya, dreamed that a white elephant had entered her womb. Ten lunar months later, as she strolled in the garden of Lumbini, the child emerged from under her right arm. He was able to walk and talk immediately. A lotus flower blossomed under his foot at each step, and he announced that this would be his last lifetime. The king summoned the court astrologers to predict the boy’s future. Seven agreed that he would become either a universal monarch (chakravartin) or a buddha; one astrologer said that there was no doubt, the child would become a buddha. His mother died seven days after his birth, and so he was reared by his mother’s sister, Mahaprajapati. As a young child, the prince was once left unattended during a festival. Later in the day he was discovered seated in meditation under a tree, whose shadow had remained motionless throughout the day to protect him from the sun.

Sources:

·         https://tricycle.org/magazine/who-was-buddha-2/

·         https://www.britannica.com/biography/Buddha-founder-of-Buddhism/Previous-lives