Tuesday, March 24, 2020

The Village in the Jungle by Leonard Woolf A tale of the evil in man and the jungle


By Godwin Witane posted by D.N. Aloysius

Leonard Woolf's Village in the jungle is one of the few books that has been written on the life and conditions of the peasants in the remote jungle villages in the Dry Zone.
This story undoubtedly is interesting not only to the people of this island but also to people of other countries who would like to know the conditions of the people who were living in villages under British rule then, now long forgotten.
The author of this book Leonard Woolf who was A.G.A. Hambantota spent nearly three years of the seven years he spent in the island closely associating and working among the rural unsophisticated villagers in the arid jungles now nearly extinct except only the memory depicting out a trace of what existed then, a stump of a dead palm tree or a mound of earth where a hut had stood.
The whole area has now returned to jungle leaving a depression in the ground in places which had once been a village tank. The author in describing the life and the conditions of the people in one such village called Beddegama recalls that there were strange happenings about its surroundings and within this village.
Among the chief characters in the story Silindu and his two twin daughters Punchi Menika and Hinnihamy are disclosed as playing a melancholy role in their struggle against the powerful spirits of the jungle, the beasts that inhabited it and their unequal conflict with the evil representatives of the ruling authority, the Village Headman Babehamy and the cruel native doctor Punchirala, the evil of whom lurked deep down in their nature and demeanour.
The land in Hambantota District was flat and low and usually missed both monsoons making the climate very hot and dry. There the rainfall was as low as 25" a year and as a result even the water holes in the jungle ran dry when the jungle animals like deer and sambhur suffered the most. It is only the elephant that remembered the far off rivers.
The other animals smelling the sea breeze in the air wander about sniffing the air for days, their heads always turned towards the sea far away until they die of thirst and exhaustion. Even if they find a water hole the water is usually found very low that these animals cannot get down to it. They wander round and round it for days when they fall prey to predators.
The peasants did not have a settled form of agriculture and only when water was available in the form of tanks fed by the rain they resorted to agriculture and were less poor. Others resorted to chena cultivation utilizing the scanty rain that fell in those parts and lived in the jungles centred round groups of villagers living by these means. Malaria was the scourge that wiped out village communities.
The attitude to life in this small community had the note of fatalistic acceptance of a malevolence natural to the people of Baddegama. Sometimes the oft spoken phrase was "What can we do? What can we do? Always evil is coming to the house from the jungle? There are devils in the trees in the jungle".
No jungle was more evil than the jungle which lay about the village of Baddegama. The jungle surrounded it, overhung it and continuously pressed upon it. For the villagers life was a weary, ominous, permanent and pitiful struggle especially for Silindu. However, human effort were not always defeated. The villagers melancholy resigned to this sad fate.
The villagers though they professed Buddhism had a strange and more intimate relationship with the jungle deities than with Buddhism. Silindu's wife dies after the birth of twins Punchi Menika and Hinnihamy, Silindu brings his sister-in-law to bring up the twins.
When Punchi Menika comes of age the Headman's wife's cousin Babun marries her and the other girl Hinnihamy is married to a local Vedarala and Kattadiya called Punchirala.
A money lender from the town called Fernando fleeces the villagers and exploits their chena harvest. Fernando tries to lure Punchi Menika and the Headman too encourages it. Failing this proposal the Headman brings a false case against Babun and Silindu of house breaking.
They are prosecuted in Hambantota Law Courts and Babun is convicted on false evidence and Silindu is acquitted.
Evil and human suffering are symbolized in the story of Beddegama where the effort of man are small and defeated. The people of the village endured the suffering which is displayed by Punchi Menike who withstand alone until the parched jungle trust upon her.
Leonard Woolf the young Civil Servant arrived in Ceylon in the year 1904 and was posted in Jaffna where he learnt Tamil and after a short spell was stationed in Kandy. He learnt Sinhala there. In his third year of service he was promoted as A.G.A. Hambantota where he spent nearly three years.
The Government Agent of early British rule enjoyed more authority than his counterpart of today. He had close contact with the people whose affairs he administered in South Ceylon. Leonard Woolf was a keen person who had the power of human observation.
He projected an accurate picture of the peasants and the quality of living in the small community. He held a most influential and powerful position in Government.
The Civil Servants were the virtual rulers of Ceylon next to the Governor. They were entrusted with executive functions. They also had an important share in the judiciary. They were intelligent and able men. They did not favour any caste or community and their powers were not misused.
Leonard Woolf had enough leisure and therefore his contact with the people was more often immediate and personal. A story about an incident where a barber had harassed one of his customers in order to gain more money is related in Woolf's diaries.
An old man with one side of his face shaved and the other side unshaven rushed to the Government Agent and fell at his feet.
He complained that the barber in the bazaar after shaving one half of his face had refused to shave the other part unless he paid 50 cents.
The price of a shave at that time was only 5 cents. Immediately the barber was sent for and he appeared accompanied by a crowd of spectators. The decision was that if he cut the client's face carelessly he was to pay 50 cents to the client. The operation was completed under a coconut tree before a large crowd of spectators jeering at the barber who with a rouged face performed his action with the greatest care not to injure the customer. This incident had occurred when the G.A. was in circuit in the villages.
In 1911 Leonard Woolf went to England on an year's leave where he married Virginia an old school friend but at the end of his leave he resigned from the Ceylon Civil Service to devote his time in literary pursuits in England.
He became a writer, publisher and an editor. Woolf visited Sri Lanka in the year 1960 at the age of 80 and made a sentimental visit to Hambantota District where he had spent 3 years from 1908 to 1911.


English Literature EEN 1024, External Degree Program, Bhiksu University of Sri Lanka Anuradhapura

Summary Of the novel, The Village in the Jungle
Leonard Woolf, husband of Virginia Woolf, the celebrated author, drew on his own experiences as a colonial civil servant in Ceylon to write this ground-breaking book. It is one of the best-loved and best-known stories in Sri Lanka, even today.
The Village in the Jungle describes the lives of a poor family in a tiny isolated village as they struggle to survive. Apart from the problems of poverty, disease, superstition and the pitfalls of the jungle itself, they must contend with an unsympathetic colonial system and the corruption it engenders. The head of the family is a hunter, Silindu, with two daughters. Their lives are shattered when a licentious trader comes to the village and convinces the headman to frame the elder daughter’s husband and send him to prison. Although Silindu tries to intervene, he is put on trial for murder in an English-speaking court where he has no voice.
This volume includes a short story, ‘Pearls and Swine’, which vividly draws on Woolf’s own experiences as a young District Commissioner, as well as a new biographical afterword by Sir Christopher Ondaatje, author of Woolf in Ceylon. Packed with first-hand knowledge of the colonial machine, The Village in the Jungle accurately depicts its profound disregard for its subject peoples.
 Leonard Woolf
The Village in the Jungle is a novel by Leonard Woolf, published in 1913, based on his experiences as a colonial civil servant in British-controlled Ceylon in the early years of the 20th century. Ground-breaking in Western fiction for being written from the native rather than the colonial point of view, it is also an influential work of Sri Lankan literature.
Background
Leonard Woolf worked for the British Ceylon Civil Service in Sri Lanka for seven years after graduating from Cambridge University in 1904. He became Assistant Government Agent in Hambantota District, dealing with a variety of administrative and judicial issues. The district he was in charge of had a population of 100,000 people. Books he took with him to Sri Lanka included the complete works of Voltaire. Woolf also kept a comprehensive diary while there and later said that his experiences in the country led to him adopting liberal political views and becoming an opponent of imperialism. He wrote The Village in the Jungle, his first novel, after he returned from Sri Lanka to England in 1911 while he was courting his future wife, Virginia Stephen. He dedicated the novel to her.
Plot
The novel describes the lives of a poor family in a small village called Beddagama as they struggle to survive the challenges presented by poverty, disease, superstition, the unsympathetic colonial system, and the jungle itself. The head of the family is a farmer named Silindu, who has two daughters named Punchi Menika and Hinnihami. After being manipulated by the village authorities and a debt collector, Silindu is put on trial for murder.



Friday, February 21, 2020

Bhiksu University External Degree Course-2020 The Village in the Jungle


The Village in the Jungle is a novel by Leonard Woolf, published in 1913, based on his experiences as a colonial civil servant in British-controlled Ceylon in the early years of the 20th century. Ground-breaking in Western fiction for being written from the native rather than the colonial point of view, it is also an influential work of Sri Lankan literature. It was republished by Eland in 2008.
Background
Leonard Woolf worked for the British Ceylon Civil Service in Sri Lanka for seven years after graduating from Cambridge University in 1904. In Cambridge Woolf had met and befriended members of the Bloomsbury Group. He became the Assistant Government Agent in Hambantota District, dealing with a variety of administrative and judicial issues. The district he was in charge of had a population of 100,000 people. Woolf also kept a comprehensive diary and later said that his experiences in the country led to him adopting liberal political views and becoming an opponent of imperialism. He wrote The Village in the Jungle, his first novel, after he returned from Sri Lanka to England in 1911 while he was courting his future wife Virginia Stephen. He dedicated the novel to her.
Plot
The novel describes the lives of a poor family in a small village called Beddagama as they struggle to survive the challenges presented by poverty, disease, superstition, the unsympathetic colonial system, and the jungle itself. The head of the family is a farmer named Silindu, who has two daughters named Punchi Menika and Hinnihami. After being manipulated by the village authorities and a debt collector, Silindu is put on trial for murder.


Sunday, February 16, 2020

Bhiksu University of Sri Lanka Anuradhapura External Degree Program English Literature


Fear No More
William Shakespeare (1564-1616)
Fear no more the heat o’ the sun;
Nor the furious winter’s rages,
Thou thy worldly task hast done,
Home art gone, and ta’en thy wages;
Golden lads and girls all must,
As chimney sweepers come to dust. 
Fear no more the frown of the great,
Thou art past the tyrant’s stroke:
Care no more to clothe and eat;
To thee the reed is as the oak:
The sceptre, learning, physic, must
All follow this, and come to dust. 
Fear no more the lightning-flash,
Nor the all-dread thunder-stone;
Fear not slander, censure rash;
Thou hast finished joy and moan;
All lovers young, all lovers must
Consign to thee, and come to dust. 
No exorciser harm thee!
Nor no witchcraft charm thee!
Ghost unlaid forbear thee!
Nothing ill come near thee!
Quiet consummation have; 
And renowned be thy grave! 
 In ‘Fear No More The Heat of the Sun’ Shakespeare uses pathetic fallacy, weather conditions representing human emotion, and images of earthly struggle or difficulty to portray death as a relief. Although he presents death as inevitable these images are meant to comfort and sooth the dead and mourning as the departed will be moving to a better place.
The poem opens with the phrase ‘fear no more’, which is then repeated a further three times in the poem, which suggests death provides an end to particular earthly fears. The repetition not only serves to emphasis the many troubles we face in earthly life, but also acts as a soothing method for the poetic voice as if he is trying to convince himself that the deceased will be better off.
This repeated phrase is connected to natural images of weather conditions and seasons that are used by Shakespeare to represent human emotions. The contrasting weather of the ‘heat o’ th’ sun’ and the ‘furious winter’s rages’ represent emotional extremes of romance or passion and then misery, loneliness or despair. Although we often associate the sun with being a positive we must not forget its power to burn, which is also true of love that can give us unbelievable emotional highs, but is also prone to cause lasting pain and strife. Winter is used in a more traditional manner and the cold and harshness of the season clearly resonates with feelings of isolation and loneliness, but could also represent the ravages of old age (as winter represents the end of our lives as trees and flowers wither and die away) and the fact the deceased will no longer have to face this.
In addition, Shakespeare tells the deceased they will no longer have to worry about ‘lightning flash’ or ‘dreaded-thunder-stone’, both of which could represent emotions of shock or fear. I think he uses these divergent weather conditions to suggest that death frees us from uncertainty and the ups and downs of human life. He presents our avoidance of this rollercoaster as a positive journey, but I believe that the words of the poem suggest that the poetic voice is not completely convinced this is true.
In the third stanza, the poem claims the deceased has ‘finished joy and moan’. This is presented as a positive and that is understandable in terms of issues that cause humans to moan such as the financial difficulties suggested by having to care about ‘clothe and eat’ and being subject to a ruler’s whims and fancies implied by the phrase ‘the frown o’ th’ great’. These phrases both tell us that death allows us to escape earthly pressures, like supporting and feeding a family, and having to avoid upsetting others and becoming victim to their desire for revenge or punishment. However, Shakespeare also links death to the end of joy, which can surely not be a positive. This may just hint at the true feelings of the poetic voice, and gives the reader a hint of their regret that the deceased will never again experience the dizzying highs of life.
Alternatively this could be interpreted as being the state of things in the next life. Although heaven is supposed to be a kingdom of love,  it is also one free of extremes of emotion and thus romantic highs are not really something one would associate with the next life. There is a clear suggestion that the poetic voice feels the deceased will transcend to heaven in the opening stanza; Shakespeare says the deceased has gone ‘home’, which tells us that earth was only a temporary destination and has connotations of warmth and comfort. Further, they have ‘ta’en thy wages’ which implies that their actions on earth are converted to credit in the next life. This is clearly referring to heaven and the ‘wages’ must represent the morality and virtuous life the deceased has led, thus securing a spot in heaven.
Whether this person was truly virtuous we do not know, but the purpose of claiming they will ascend to heaven is again soothing. It is easier for the mourners to accept the death if they think that life will continue and be better for their loved one. In addition to this, Shakespeare repeats the idea that all ‘come to dust’ (whether they be wealthy or poor, distinguished or not, loved or loathed) to emphasize the inevitability of death. If all of us are going to meet the same fate then we need not fear it; death is thus presented as an inevitable part of life and something we should embrace and accept rather than curse and fear. However, the confidence in this ascension and in a peaceful life after death, expressed through the listing of various earthly worries, is undermined by the final stanza.
A series of imperatives commands evil spirits and the likes not to interfere with the deceased. The use of exclamation at the end of each of these commands demonstrates the passion and intense mourning of the poetic voice. The prior calm and confidence of the opening three stanzas is completely dismissed and it is as if true grief has overcome the poetic voice at the end. However, the fact that the poet has to warn off ‘witchcraft’, ‘ghost’ and ‘exorciser’ suggests that the soothing confidence that everything will be better in the next life is not absolute. The warnings imply the poetic voice has worries about the afterlife and exactly what will happen to their deceased friend.
So Shakespeare has used a combination of weather imagery and pathetic fallacy alongside images of aspects of earthly struggle and toil to present death as a positive and inevitable part of life and something that will beckon a happier existence. However, there are a few slips in this presentation and a sense of regret and lamentation can be traced in the fact that the deceased will no longer experience the highs of human existence and there is also an expression of fear in the final stanza as the poetic voice tries to ward off evil spirits.
Summary
This poem has been taken from Shakespeare's play Cymbeline. This is a death poem having universal appeal. In this poem the poet has expressed his feeling for the rest of the soul of the dead. It is written for the consolation of the dead. The poet wants to say that a dead person becomes free from all kinds of worldly anxieties. It is full of moral lessons.
A dead person cannot feel the heat of the sun. A living person has to face the scorching sun and bitter coldness of the winter season. But after death, he gets rid of them. After death a person goes to heaven, which is his permanent home. As a laborer works and goes home after taking his wages, so a dead person goes home with his success and failures. The poet further advises a dead person not to be disappointed from death because death is the fate of every person. It lays its icy hands over all whether he is a handsome fellow, a beautiful girl or a chimney sweeper. All must die one day.
A dead person is immune from the anger of his master. In his lifetime, he is in financial trouble. He has no sufficient money for buying necessary cloth and proper fund. Consequently, he has no proper cloth to cover his body and proper food to satisfy his hunger. But after death, he does not feel any necessity of these things. Death is very impartial. It does not distinguish between the poor and rich. Kings, learned men, physicians and doctors must die one day.
A dead man does not fear the lightening flash nor thunder-storm. He is free from public criticism. Joy and sorrow are the same for him. In his life time sometime he is happy and sometimes sad. But after death, he does not feel anything. At last the poet says that death should not be the cause of sorrow because all persons, whether they are young lover or old one, must die and meet the dust. It is lyrical and follows a systematic pattern, example 'the sun' 'done', 'rages', 'wages' 'must' 'dust' etc.

Analysis  

Death knows no age, culture, social class, or gender. It is the inevitability that defines equality between every soul and meaning to every life. This idea is prominent through the poem, “Fear No More the Heat o’ the Sun”, written by William Shakespeare. In the poem, the author embodies the narrator speaking to the audience about living without the fear of several difficulties in life. The poem is somewhat of a funeral song, in which the author formulates an argument that highlights the significance of death. Shakespeare illustrates the theme and messages in the poem through repetition, structure, diction, and hyperbole. All at which contribute to unify this metaphorical piece that attempts to consolidate those who have lost a loved one or advice those trapped in anxiety - prevented from living life to the absolute fullest.
Repetition and structure are the roots, at which stabilize the poem. Initially, the phrase, “Fear no more” reappears at the beginning of the first three stanzas to reinforce the idea of living without worry. Shakespeare consistently includes the end rhymes “must” and “come to dust” as the final couplet of the first three stanzas in order to sternly state the inevitability of death.
Themes of the Poem
William Shakespeare utilizes simplistic language to emphasize the themes in “Fear no more;” however, he exercises complex metaphors to depict the struggles one undergoes during a lifetime and as a result urges the reader to overcome all melancholic sentiments that lead one to oppose a peaceful death. The diction applied in “Fear no more” efficiently creates emphasis on specific sections of the poem. In addition, the euphonic flow used by Shakespeare illustrates the author’s serenity and resignation towards the subject at hand. In essence, Shakespeare’s “Fear no more” employs rhetorical devices such as repetition, appeal to the audience, and imagery to reveal the desired theme. 
The fundamental theme of this poem is regarding the significance of succumbing to death, for after having a full life everyone must fearlessly face the end. In addition, the poem emphasizes that one should not fight against the arrival of death in any of its forms. In fact, this argument is first introduced in the title and further displayed throughout Shakespeare’s poem. In the first line of all three stanzas, the author begins with the phrase, “Fear no more,” openly showing his belief that one should willingly submit to mortality. Furthermore, the poem’s theme is displayed through the phrase “all must … come to dust.” By acknowledging that death is inevitable for all of humanity, the author attempts to emphasize his belief that one should not “fear” fate. The theme of the poem is also reinforced through repetition. For example, to emphasize his stance, the author repeats the phrase, “Fear no more” in the first line of the first, second, and third stanza of the poem. Once again this occurs with the phrase, “must… come to dust” in the fifth and sixth line of the first, second, and third stanza.
The poem ‘Fear no more heat o’ the sun’ by William Shakespeare is a poem about that death can come at any age, and all the troubles and worries that happening while living will not matter while we are dead. In this poem the persona reassures the responder about the notion of death numerous times. The imperative mood of the opening line, “Fear no more…” reassures the responder about the notion of death.  Shakespeare’s repetition of this line throughout the first three stanzas reinforces this idea, while the volta created by the shift to the exclamatory mood in the final stanza serves to drive this message home for the responder as it soothes the human anxiety about death. The juxtaposition of the two extremes of the “heat o’ the sun” and the “furious winter” reinforces the idea that we have no need to fear even the most harsh seasons.  Furthermore, Shakespeare personifies the winter in order to dramatize this contrast while the diction of the adjective “furious” emphasizes this drama. The juxtaposition of the two extremes “Golden lads and girls” (“golden” symbolizing wealth and favor) and “chimney-sweepers” (symbolizing the poor street urchins) conveys the idea that death is inevitable, because these extremes represent the children of the richest and those of the poorest classes to  symbolize that death equally to all humanity regardless of social-class. The diction of “must” creates high modality to emphasize death’s inevitability, which is represented by the metaphor and biblical allusion “come to dust”. This allusion, together with the diction “must”, is repeated at the end of the first three stanzas to highlight the poem’s central thesis about the inevitability of death.
Secondly, within the second stanza focuses the human condition to convey that death will liberate us from these concerns.  Shakespeare states that we need not fear the metaphoric “frown of the great” and “tyrant’s stroke” to highlight that death will liberate humanity from oppressive rulers. Similarly, we are reminded that in death we need not have physiological and safety worries, “to clothe and eat”, as Shakespeare suggests these are irrelevant in death.  Shakespeare lists the various professions through the synecdoches, “the scepter, learning, physic”, referring to everyone from the king, to the teacher to the doctor, to convey that all humankind, regardless of profession, will be a victim of death. In the poem’s final stanza, the exclamatory lines focus on the evils that trouble humanity, symbolized by “witchcraft”, “Ghost” and “ill”, building the tension that is then diffused in the softer diction of the final couplet. As the poem ends, “Quiet consummation have / And renowned be thy grave!”, this leaves the responder with the idea that death is a time for peace. In conclusion, the poem juxtaposes the complex needs and fears of life, shelter, safety, food and love with the simplicity and finality of death as we all “must”, simply, “come to dust”.  
Overview
This poem is all about death and trying to help someone coping. Strangely though it is addressed to the deceased as an imperative (order), but is really designed to help the poetic voice cope with the loss of a friend or lover as they try to see death as a positive journey ending earthly worries and concerns. However, this is tinged with high emotion throughout and particularly in the final stanza.
Context
This poem comes from the drama, Cymbeline by Shakespeare. In this drama,  King’s daughter, Imogen, falling victim of a plot by her stepmother to put her non-royal son, Cloten, on the throne by marrying him to Imogen. However, Imogen has fallen in love with and secretly married another person, who is banished for going behind the King’s, Cymbeline.
Anyway, it all gets very complicated and Imogen dresses up as a man to run off to find her love and ends up sheltering in a cave with two young men who bear a striking resemblance to her. It turns out that they are her brothers who’d been kidnapped at birth and brought up by a traitor. These two brothers, Guiderus and Arvirargus (at this stage known as Polydore and Cadwal), are our speakers as Imogen takes some medicine as she is feeling weak from her journey, which appears to kill her. The poison had been planted by her stepmother at some point, but then switched by the court doctor to something that only had the appearance of being lethal. When her brothers mourn they think she is a good looking man ‘Fidele’ and lament his passing rather than their sisters. The wicked stepmother dies and Imogen finds love again and her brothers’ true identities are revealed.
Summary of the drama, Cymbeline,
Imogen, the daughter of the British king Cymbeline, goes against her father's wishes and marries a lowborn gentleman, Posthumus instead of his stepson, Cloten. Cloten is the son of Cymbeline's new Queen, a villainous woman who has made the king her puppet. Cymbeline sends Posthumus into exile in Italy, where he encounters a smooth-tongued Italian named Iachimo. Iachimo argues that all women are naturally unchaste, and he makes a wager with Posthumus that he will be able to seduce Imogen. He goes to the British court and, failing in his initial attempt to convince the princess to sleep with him, resorts to trickery: He hides in a large chest and has it sent to her room; that night he slips out, observes her sleeping, and steals a bracelet that Posthumus once gave to her.
Cloten, meanwhile, continues to pursue Imogen, but she rebuffs him harshly. He becomes furious and vows revenge, while she worries over the loss of her bracelet. In the meantime, Iachimo has returned to Italy, and, displaying the stolen bracelet and an intimate knowledge of the details of Imogen's bedchamber, convinces Posthumus that he won the bet. Posthumus, furious at being betrayed by his wife, sends a letter to Britain ordering his servant, Pisanio, to murder Imogen. But, Pisanio believes in Imogen's innocence, and he convinces her to disguise herself as a boy and go search for her husband, while he reports to Posthumus that he has killed her.
Imogen, however, soon becomes lost in the wilds of Wales, and she comes upon a cave where Belarius, an unjustly banished nobleman, lives with his two sons, Guiderius and Arviragus. In fact, the two young men are not his sons but Cymbeline's; Belarius has kidnapped them to avenge his banishment, though they themselves are ignorant of their true parentage. They welcome Imogen, who is still dressed as a boy. Meanwhile, Cloten appears, having come in pursuit of Imogen; he fights a duel with Guiderius, who kills him. Imogen, feeling ill, drinks a potion the queen has given her. Although the queen told her it was medicinal, the queen herself believed it to be a poison. However, the draught merely induces a deep sleep that resembles death. Belarius and his adoptive sons come upon Imogen and, heart-broken, lay her body beside that of the slain Cloten. Awaking after they have left the scene, she mistakes the body of Cloten for that of Posthumus, and she sinks into despair. A Roman army has invaded Britain, seeking the restoration of a certain tribute Britain has ceased to pay. (A "tribute" here is a payment given to one nation by another in return for a promise of non-aggression.) The disguised Imogen hires herself out to them as a page.
Posthumus and Iachimo are traveling with the Roman army, but Posthumus switches to the garb of a British peasant and fights valiantly for Britain. Indeed, in his combat he actively seeks death: He believes his servant to have carried out his orders and killed Imogen, and he regrets his actions. The Romans are defeated, thanks to the intervention of Belarius, Guiderius, and Arviragus, and Posthumus, still trying to punish himself, switches back to Roman garb and allows himself to be taken prisoner. That night, the god Jupiter promises the spirits of Posthumus's dead ancestors that he will care for their descendant. The next day, Cymbeline calls the prisoners before him, and the confusion is sorted out. Posthumus and Imogen are reunited, and they forgive a contrite Iachimo, who confesses his deception. The identity of Guiderius and Arviragus is revealed, Belarius is forgiven, and the Queen dies, leaving the king free of her evil influence. As a final gesture, Cymbeline frees the Roman prisoners and even agrees to resume paying the tribute.

Bhiksu University of Sri Lanka Anuradhapura External Degree Program English Literature



__________________________________________________________________
The Village in the Jungle by Leonard Woolf
Sexuality/Brutality/Lust
The Village in the Jungle tells the story of twin sisters, Punchi Menika and Hinnihami, each of whom has a "strangeness and wildness" associated with the jungle. Each is brought under the thumb of a dominant man. Leonard's description of the near rape through which a young man, Babun, claims Punchi Menika as his mate:
 "She allowed him to take her into the thick jungle, but she struggled with him, and her whole body shook with fear and desire as she felt his hands upon her breasts. A cry broke from her, in which, joy and desire mingled with the fear and the pain”.
 However, frightening Babun's lust, Punchi Menika's married life may be more chilling, for soon her "wildness" becomes "dimmer and vaguer":
 "She became the man's woman, the cook of his food, the cleaner of his house, and bearer of his children".
 Hinnihami fares worse. A hideously scarred old shaman, Punchirala, begins to hanker for her, and despite her elaborate efforts to resist him, Hinnihami finds that the old man's magic is potent enough to endanger her father's life. Reluctantly, Hinnihami agrees to be given to Punchirala.
 But, she defiantly interprets the agreement to mean that she will be his sexual partner for only one night. Nevertheless, she becomes pregnant, and soon after giving birth, she begins to suckle an orphaned fawn alongside her daughter, Punchi Nona. The girl dies, and Hinnihami comes to think of the deer, which she continues to nurse, as her son. When drought and other ills descend on the village, its superstitious inhabitants, blaming Hinnihami's aberrant behavior, surround the deer to stone it. Hinnihami tries to intervene, but they throw her to the ground, tearing her jacket to shreds, and beat her. The deer dies later that day; Hinnihami is dead by the next morning. The narrative then turns back to Punchi Menika. She is soon pursued by a powerful older man, Fernando, who has her husband sent off to prison, where he dies; Fernando himself is shot dead by Punchi Menika's father, who is then imprisoned for life. The novel ends with Punchi Menika alone in the deserted village, waiting for death, which comes in the ambiguously metaphoric form of a wild boar gliding into her hut with gleaming white tusks.
He felt that The Village in the Jungle expressed his growing anti-imperialism after leaving the civil service, and the respect he shows the native people of Ceylon in the novel.
Plot
The novel describes the lives of a poor family in a small village called Beddagama (literally, "The village in the Jungle") as they struggle to survive the challenges presented by poverty, disease, superstition, the unsympathetic colonial system, and the jungle itself. The head of the family is a hunter named Silindu, who has two daughters named Punchi Menika and Hinnihami. After being manipulated by the village authorities and a debt collector, Silindu is put on trial for murder.
The story of The Village in the Jungle is full of acrimony. It is disgusting to see that human beings are subjected to such levels of torture and misery by their own neighbors and the administrators. Unfortunately, the story of the novel is not unique only to Baddegama. It is the story of the rural Sri Lanka during colonial times. The story of the rural villages is not that different even today with all the advancement of technology and democracy we are supposed to enjoy.
Leonard Woolf selects a few characters of the village, Baddegama in the deep down south of Sri Lanka and tells us a story about how the dreams of a young couple, Babun and Punchimenika shatter away due to the lewdness of a trader who comes to the village and subsequent troubles created to separate Babun from Punchimenika.
In the backdrop of the main story, there is another story about Punchimenika’s younger sister, Hinnihamy being forced to marry an old and vicious indigenous medical practitioner and her subsequent death by the villagers due to the suspicions inculcated against her in the villagers’ mind by the medical practitioner as she refuses to be his wife.
Silindu, the protagonist of the novel leads a miserable life squeezed in to the jungle and the bureaucracy. He is as silent as a deer and becomes violent as a provoked water buffalo when it is too much for him to tolerate the wickedness of the world.
There is a Sinhala language movie with the same name based on the novel with roles played by Wijaya Kumarathunga, Malani Fonseka, Joe Abeywickrama, Tony Ranasinghe, D. R. Nanayakkara and Nadeeka Gunasekara. Dr. Arthur C. Clarke makes a cameo appearance. The film is directed by none other than Lester James Pieris. (Wanninayake)
The Village in the Jungle (1913) was his first novel, based on his administrative and personal experiences when working as an Assistant Government Agent in the Hambantota District of Ceylon. Mirroring Woolf’s own disillusionment with the imperial project, the novel traces its protagonist Silindu’s struggle against the slow but steady bureaucratization of life that comes with the account books, gun licenses and courthouses of colonial rule, which ultimately leads him to murder. The novel is a strange counterpoint to Woolf’s other writing from his time in Ceylon. While his official administrative diaries show meticulous records of legal proceedings, pearl fishing and harvesting, The Village in the Jungle finds facts difficult to grapple with. Dominated by a narrative voice from within Silindu’s community, the novel nevertheless refuses to put forward definite opinions. Using the master-trope of the modernist colonial novel, disorientation, all the characters and events that Woolf writes about are, like the jungle, shrouded in a sense of unknowability.
The novel is an exceptional contribution to the modernist period, largely because of its unusual treatment of racially other characters.
The Village in the Jungle has a single white character (a magistrate, possibly based on Woolf himself), and escapes resorting to stereotypes of the “native” as uncivilized, immature and dangerous. Instead, a more complex portrait of Sinhalese colonial society is created. Rather than simply representing the colonial encounter in terms of binaries of them, the novel demonstrates that communities are built not just on race, but also on affect and fellow- feeling. Woolf’s fellow colonizers, as the volume of his autobiography dealing with Ceylon, Growing, shows us, had little in common with him; he in turn was disgusted by their artificiality and stylized behavior. Similarly, while Silindu’s oppressors, headmen and petty moneylenders, are definitely instruments of the colonial state, they are Sinhalese like him, and yet see nothing but bestiality in him that they at once exploit and are afraid of. The magistrate, on the other hand, not only recognizes the suffering he sees in Silindu’s face when he is brought before him on charges of murder, but identifies with his pain in a manner that renders barriers of race and colour irrelevant.
The aftermath of The Village in the Jungle spurred Woolf on to write a series of tracts that argued against the British Empire, both as an economic as well as a moral-political construct. He also went on to actively propound these views through his associations with the Labour Party and Fabian Society. He was only to visit Ceylon again in 1960, nine years before his death. The novel, in its centenary year of publication, remains today a central text in the Sri Lankan colonial literary canon.
 Leonard Woolf`s village in the jungle is a fascinating novel written about the life of the peasants in Sri Lanka during the British rule. The story takes place in a remote jungle village called Baddegama . The writer recalls the strange happenings not only within Baddegama but also in its surroundings. The story is between a high cast family and a low cast family and how a foreign man who comes to the village influences these two families. The story goes on describing how the low cast family is suffered by the high cast family and their friends in the village. 
In 1980, Sir Lester James Peries released a superb film based on this well-known novel, naming it Baddegama . The film helped the novel to be as real as it was in the reader`s imagination as it gave faces to the main characters such as Silindu , and his two daughters, Punchi Manika and Hinnihamy , Babun , also not forgetting the cruel native doctor Punchirala , the village headman Bebehamy and Fernando.
Answer the following question.
The poor and needy people of The Village in the Jungle are always suppressed by the rich and powerful people in the same society. Discuss with relevant extracts.

Bhiksu University of Sri Lanka External Degree Program 2020 First Year Students English Literature


The village in the Jungle is a novel written by Leonard Woolf, who was an English writer. He was the former Government Agent of the Hambanthota district. Woolf discusses several social issues Silindu’s family faces through his experience.  They are poverty, ignorance, superstition, and evil of the jungle, drought, diseases, indebtedness and unsympathetic colonial system.
Throughout the novel, Woolf tries to portray one of the major issues, poverty. Most of the villagers of Beddagama are confronted with this problem. It is Silindu and his family who suffer critically. The following line indicates how these poor and needy   people are highly victimized:
“Will you let me die of hunger? and my two children? Give but five kurunies, and I will repay it threefold.”
These words are uttered by Silindu to the village headman. Because of the dry weather Silindu’s crops fail. As a result, he and his family members have nothing to eat in the house. The following lines prove his pain:
“Ralahami, there is nothing to eat in the house. There is Karlinahami to feed too. If you could, but lend me ten kurunies, I would repay it two fold at the reaping of Nugagaha-hena.”
That’s why Silindu visit the village headman and makes a humble request since his two children are starving.

Bhiksu University of Sri Lanka External Degree Program 2020 First Year Students English Literature

Lectures commenced on 16.02.2020 (Sunday) from 1.30 pm to 5.30 pm
Discussion Session
Writing a Model Answer
Crucial Issues confronted by the people of Beddagama
I highly appreciate the students' contribution.
Modes of Communication
1. E mail
2. SMS
3. Speaking with microphone
4. Writing
The Village in the Jungle(Novel)
Fear No More (Poem)
Please visit my website for notes. Next lecture will be conducted on 05.04.2020 (Sunday 1.30 pm to 5.30 pm)
Please read the novel and poem and attend the lecture. You are also required to read all my handouts and prepare yourselves for the discussion.
D.N. Aloysius