The
goal of communication is to convey information—and the understanding of that
information—from one person or group to another person or group. This
communication process is divided into three basic components: A sender transmits
a message through a channel to the receiver. (Figure shows
a more elaborate model.) The sender first develops an idea, which is composed
into a message and then transmitted to the other party, who interprets the
message and receives meaning. Information theorists have added somewhat more
complicated language. Developing a message is known as encoding. Interpreting
the message is referred to as decoding.
The other important feature is the
feedback cycle. When two people interact, communication is rarely one‐way only. When a person receives a
message, she responds to it by giving a reply. The feedback cycle is the same
as the sender‐receiver
feedback noted in Figure. Otherwise, the sender can't know whether the other
parties properly interpreted the message or how they reacted to it. Feedback is
especially significant in management because a supervisor has to know how
subordinates respond to directives and plans. The manager also needs to know
how work is progressing and how employees feel about the general work situation.
The critical factor in measuring the
effectiveness of communication is common understanding. Understanding exists
when all parties involved have a mutual agreement as to not only the
information, but also the meaning of the information. Effective communication,
therefore, occurs when the intended message of the sender and the interpreted
message of the receiver are one and the same. Although this should be the goal
in any communication, it is not always achieved.
The most efficient communication
occurs at a minimum cost in terms of resources expended. Time, in particular,
is an important resource in the communication process. For example, it would be
virtually impossible for an instructor to take the time to communicate
individually with each student in a class about every specific topic covered.
Even if it were possible, it would be costly. This is why managers often leave
voice mail messages and interact by e‐mail rather than visit their
subordinates personally.
However, efficient time‐saving communications are not always
effective. A low‐cost approach such as an e‐mail note to a distribution list may
save time, but it does not always result in everyone getting the same meaning
from the message. Without opportunities to ask questions and clarify the message,
erroneous interpretations are possible. In addition to a poor choice of
communication method, other barriers to effective communication include noise
and other physical distractions, language problems, and failure to recognize
nonverbal signals.
Sometimes communication is
effective, but not efficient. A work team leader visiting each team member
individually to explain a new change in procedures may guarantee that everyone
truly understands the change, but this method may be very costly on the leader's
time. A team meeting would be more efficient. In these and other ways,
potential tradeoffs between effectiveness and efficiency occur.
Sources: http://www.cliffsnotes.com/more-subjects/principles-of-management/communication-and-interpersona...
No comments:
Post a Comment